My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-16-23 PTRC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Packets (2010 to Present)
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
05-16-23 PTRC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2023 9:20:10 AM
Creation date
5/11/2023 9:19:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks, Trails & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes April 18, 2023 Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />to create a blueprint, eradicate the buckthorn, and plantings. The one condition of receiving grant <br />money is to leave the property natural for five years. Estimates include $105,000 for Floral Park, <br />$70,000 for Hazelnut Park, $200,000 for the Chatham trails area, and $120,000 for Perry Park. <br /> <br />Committee Member Olson asked if anyone had contacted Maplewood to see how things went <br />with Great River Greening. <br /> <br />Committee Member Kelliher responded that no one had. But he had conversations with the <br />forester in New Brighton, and someone in Burnsville. <br /> <br />Committee Member Nelson asked how the City would be involved in the executional aspects of <br />the project? Would they have any say in where the goats were used or what was replanted? Or <br />would Great River Greening make all the decisions based on their expertise? <br /> <br />Committee Member Kelliher said the impression he got from speaking with the Public Works <br />Director and Public Works Superintendent was they’d like Great River Greening to take it all. <br /> <br />Committee Member Anderson wondered when they would need to know the City’s response. <br /> <br />City Council Liaison Rousseau said the Council is aware of this item being time sensitive, and if <br />possible, it could be on next Monday’s agenda. <br /> <br />Committee Member Kelliher said if they are comfortable with the work that has been done by the <br />subcommittee they could bypass calling a special PTRC meeting and go right to asking Great River <br />Greening to attend the next available City Council work session. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the timing of Council approval and potential work sessions. <br /> <br />Committee Member Nelson wondered what need they see for community engagement? His <br />neighborhood is infested with buckthorn and he has offered to pay to have it removed but people <br />don’t want to because they like the privacy the buckthorn provides. <br /> <br />Committee Member Kelliher said the naturalists said there will be areas of visibility will be <br />significant once the buckthorn is gone. So, they are emphasizing community education to let <br />people know what it will look like during and after removal. <br /> <br />Committee Member Poelzer noted there was on article online that mentions Maplewood and <br />Great River Greening. They are working with nearly three dozen communities across the state, and <br />have helped restore 22,000 acres at nearly 400 sites since 1995. <br /> <br />Committee Member Seemann clarified that the grant funding is for a five-year timespan, so <br />whatever they apply for now would have to be used from the fall of 2024 through 2029. She stated <br />the director of Great River Greening suggested starting in Floral and Hazelnut Parks as those parks <br />had made the most progress already. <br /> <br />Chair Hinton commented that if they have to leave the area natural for five years there may be <br />some people be unhappy with it in the short term. She asked if the city would have to pay anything <br />toward the work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.