Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 3, 2023 3 <br /> <br /> 1) The Applicant shall conduct the home occupation in accordance with the narrative and <br />site plans submitted. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the <br />Community Development Director, shall require review and approval as a Conditional Use <br />Permit Amendment by the Planning Commission and City Council. <br /> 2) There shall be no more than one employee that does not reside in the residence employed <br />to assist in the business activity. <br /> 3) Delivery of products will be limited, but in no instance shall it be more than once per <br />day. <br /> 4) No exterior signage shall be permitted. <br /> 5) There shall be no more than one patron per day by appointment only visiting the premise <br />to pick up their order. <br /> 6) All home occupation retail sales must be exclusively conducted online. <br /> 7) The Applicant must apply annually and obtain an Accessory Home Occupation Permit <br />from the City. <br /> 8) A screening plan shall be provided to the City for approval by the Community <br />Development Director prior to issuance of an Accessory Home Occupation Permit. <br /> 9) A Zoning Permit would be required for the installation of any new fencing. <br /> 10) The exterior business activity shall be limited to the Applicant’s description and site <br />plans as submitted. All exterior evidence of the home occupations shall not exceed 1,500 <br />square feet of the Subject Property. <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums asked if one request was dependent upon the other. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated the zoning code amendment would precede her <br />moving forward with the application given the fact the bulk of her business activity takes place <br />outside of the dwelling. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums questioned if this was all new code language. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained she surveyed eleven adjacent communities <br />and four allowed for a home occupation in a detached accessory building and none allowed for <br />exterior evidence. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums asked if the Commission had any comments regarding the language within the <br />proposed text amendment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber questioned if a greenhouse was deemed an accessory structure. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums requested further information regarding the amount of exterior space that could be <br />used for business activity. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated the language currently states the applicant can <br />use up to 33% of the dwelling or 33% in an accessory building. She explained this square footage