My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
05-15-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2023 9:56:32 AM
Creation date
6/13/2023 9:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 15, 2023 2 <br />information secret from the residents of Arden Hills and she'd like to know specifically the <br />reasons why. <br />Gregg Larson, 3377 N Snelling Avenue, stated there have been a number of instances in the <br />recent past where agendas have been a point of contention at Council meetings because of a lack <br />of prior agreement on specific agenda items, issues related to who establishes the agendas and <br />what items are appropriate for Council consideration. He said according to the League of <br />Minnesota Cities, administrative as well as legislative responsibility is the ultimate responsibility <br />of the Council as a whole. With the exception of serving as the presiding officer at Council <br />meetings, they Mayor's powers are no greater than any other councilmembers. He quoted from the <br />Minnesota Mayor's Association handbook "The weak mayor has no extraordinary power to <br />individually make administrative decisions for the city". Mr. Larson felt it was the Council, not <br />the Mayor, that should be making decisions about regular meeting agendas. He added that the <br />process the adapt for adding agenda items should be addressing applicability, prior discussion, <br />notice, and support of a Council majority at a work session. <br />2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES <br />A. Response to April 17 Work Session Public Comment <br />City Administrator Perrault spoke in response to an April 17 question posed by Ms. Swanson, <br />who asked the same questions tonight. He noted the 1,700 - 2,200 unit discussion was proposed <br />by Councilmember Fabel and Commissioner Frethem agreed that would be a good range to look <br />at. The rationale is the sentiment among the JDA advisory committee and the developer that the <br />site can handle additional density beyond the 1,460, or at least be explored, and they should look <br />at different scenarios of what that potentially looks like. They chose to look at a range of numbers <br />and scenarios surrounding that. <br />Councilmember Fabel added that a study is all that's being done, trying to understand how much <br />the property can handle and what the city can handle economically and socially. <br />Mayor Grant said the original AUAR contained two scenarios, the anticipated scenario was <br />1,500 or less. Council chose an arbitrary number of 2,500 or so if the number ever went to 1,501 <br />or higher the AUAR wouldn't have to be redone. <br />Councilmember Monson arrived at 5:11 p.m. <br />3. AGENDA ITEMS <br />A. Arden Manor and Floral Park Improvements <br />HR Green Regional Director Morast began reviewing his presentation of Arden Manor and <br />Floral Parks. He gave a project overview of each park. He explained the process used to receive <br />public input. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she had worked with a resident and staff to reach people with <br />English as a second language and felt we should have a policy with ways to get information to <br />Spanish speakers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.