Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 26, 2023 3 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented on how the cost for infrastructure has increased from $61 million to <br />$89 million. He requested further information on how almost $30 million was added. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault indicated inflation and labor supply has led to the price increases. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated City costs have risen to just over $11 million from $8.2 million. He <br />requested staff break down these expenses further. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault explained the water tower would cost roughly $7 million and the <br />remaining portion would be for City utilities along the spine road. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented he heard the JDA Advisory Committee is planning to complete its <br />work by September. He asked if this was correct. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated the JDA Advisory Committee was hoping to have a meeting <br />in September to talk through density scenarios and updated financial implications which would set <br />the stage for a term sheet by the end of the year. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant noted he received an email that had 20 to 30 questions from a resident who would <br />like answers. He indicated he read through these questions and they seemed legitimate. He stated <br />this resident would like answers to these questions and he asked that the City respond to this <br />email. <br /> <br />Councilmember Fabel explained it was his understanding this email was suggesting those <br />questions were appropriate for a public discussion. He did not disagree with this. He indicated <br />there were not answers for some of those questions. He stated the current status of the project was <br />in the same state it has been since 2016. He explained interest rates, inflation, changing lifestyles, <br />and COVID have all happened since that time. He believed it would be appropriate to address <br />these questions once more answers were available. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant indicated things have changed since the JDA was now back in session and there are <br />advisory committees. He noted the JDA has been meeting now for six months and there were <br />answers to some of the questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Fabel commented there were a series of topics that could be addressed at a <br />public session. He explained it will make much more sense when more information as available, <br />given the fact there was a gap of inactivity for five years, which has seen a great deal of damage. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated he disagreed with these statements and he believed the City should answer <br />the questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden explained there were two separate emails that the Council may be <br />discussing at this point in time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson reported there were a lot of questions that were asked early in the year. <br />She noted the JDA does not have all of the answers yet. She explained the JDA was trying to get <br />up to speed in order to understand the market conditions and increased costs. She commented the