My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
06-26-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2023 9:42:51 AM
Creation date
7/11/2023 9:42:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 26, 2023 3 <br /> Mayor Grant commented on how the cost for infrastructure has increased from $61 million to <br /> $89 million. He requested further information on how almost $30 million was added. <br /> City Administrator Perrault indicated inflation and labor supply has led to the price increases. <br /> Mayor Grant stated City costs have risen to just over $11 million from $8.2 million. He <br /> requested staff break down these expenses further. <br /> City Administrator Perrault explained the water tower would cost roughly $7 million and the <br /> remaining portion would be for City utilities along the spine road. <br /> Mayor Grant commented he heard the JDA Advisory Committee is planning to complete its <br /> work by September. He asked if this was correct. <br /> City Administrator Perrault stated the JDA Advisory Committee was hoping to have a meeting <br /> in September to talk through density scenarios and updated financial implications which would set <br /> the stage for a term sheet by the end of the year. <br /> Mayor Grant noted he received an email that had 20 to 30 questions from a resident who would <br /> like answers. He indicated he read through these questions and they seemed legitimate. He stated <br /> this resident would like answers to these questions and he asked that the City respond to this <br /> email. <br /> Councilmember Fabel explained it was his understanding this email was suggesting those <br /> questions were appropriate for a public discussion. He did not disagree with this. He indicated <br /> there were not answers for some of those questions. He stated the current status of the project was <br /> in the same state it has been since 2016. He explained interest rates, inflation, changing lifestyles, <br /> and COVID have all happened since that time. He believed it would be appropriate to address <br /> these questions once more answers were available. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated things have changed since the JDA was now back in session and there are <br /> advisory committees. He noted the JDA has been meeting now for six months and there were <br /> answers to some of the questions. <br /> Councilmember Fabel commented there were a series of topics that could be addressed at a <br /> public session. He explained it will make much more sense when more information as available, <br /> given the fact there was a gap of inactivity for five years, which has seen a great deal of damage. <br /> Mayor Grant stated he disagreed with these statements and he believed the City should answer <br /> the questions. <br /> Councilmember Holden explained there were two separate emails that the Council may be <br /> discussing at this point in time. <br /> Councilmember Monson reported there were a lot of questions.that were asked early in the year. <br /> She noted the JDA does not have all of the answers yet. She explained the JDA was trying to get <br /> up to speed in order to understand the market conditions and increased costs. She commented the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.