Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ <br /> . ~~HILLS <br /> CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br /> ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION <br /> JANUARY 14,2005,7:30 A.M. <br /> CITY HALL 2ND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 <br /> Chairman Kunkel called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. <br /> Those in attendance: Mayor Aplikowski, Chair Bruce Kunkel: Commission members Kevin <br /> Kelly, Dale Beane, Chris Ashbach, Jim Paulet and Ed Werner. Absent: Ray McGraw Staff: Scott <br /> Clark: Guest: Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers and Associates: <br /> The minutes of thc December 1, 2005 were received without additions or corrections. <br /> Mr. Clark gave an extensive report on the TCAAP process to date. The most important <br /> consideration was that the General Services Administration began the negotiation process with <br /> the City on December 20,2004 and it was agreed to that a June 1, 2005 "purchase agreement" <br /> completion would be a goal for all parties. This process had not yet been agreed to by the <br /> Council. Due to this schedule, it was discussed that the EDC would have to expedite their study <br /> process. <br /> Ms, Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers and Associates madc a very detailed presentation on tax increment <br /> It runs that was develop cd using the existing TCAAP Framework Plan as a model. Ms. Kvilvang <br /> went through every aspect of the financial analysis and stated that these types of projections are <br /> subject to a number of changes based on the assumptions, build-outs, valuations, etc. Some of <br /> the highlights included: <br /> A 25 year district would generate $70,000,000 of tax increment based on a <br /> present value calculation <br /> - The total assessed value would be $860,000,000 <br /> - The City's "new base" amount, which would be proceeds to the General Fund <br /> would be $200,000 <br /> - Additional tax increment if the City elected to have fiscal disparities within <br /> the District would generate an additional $17,000,000 <br /> Other discussions included the need for a City resource plan, capturing excess amounts over the <br /> frozen tax value and how other uses, e.g. park dedication will need to be evaluated to complete <br /> certain City expenses that will be necessary to complete the public aspects of this project. <br /> After some EDC discussion, it was agreed to that at least two more meetings will be necessary <br /> for the Commissioners to be comfortable with forwarding any type of recommendation. Due to <br /> the length of the tax increment discussions the policy considerations, which had been dispersed, <br /> was not discussed, <br /> It was agreed to that the next meeting would be at 7:00 a.m. on January 28,2005. <br /> . Meeting adjourned at 9:40 a.m. <br />