|
<br />f,~'
<br />
<br />I,
<br />
<br />;.r..... ..,~'~.:,-c'
<br />
<br />
<br />',,,",,',<"":""
<br />
<br />p:p"~:-I~r'~;~~~~ H'~;,'?;,;r'~
<br />"~c.
<br />",,',;
<br />L.-1"
<br />
<br />copy'to:
<br />
<br />, 'IHR III WHITER sf1bRT ELLIOTT .,t':SON & ASSO,....CIATES
<br />. " .~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
<br />200 HILlSBOROUGH OFFICE BLDGo 2353 RICE STREET. 0 sf, PAUL, MINNESOTA 5S1130 PHONE (6121" 4ll4-027f'
<br />
<br />re'
<br />I '
<br />I
<br />~)
<br />
<br />u
<br />u]
<br />
<br />fO:
<br />r'
<br />
<br />ii'
<br />I
<br />!.i
<br />
<br />p
<br />.//
<br />'. V r
<br />, I
<br />, ,
<br />ji
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />
<br />A.W. BANISTER, -'''.E.
<br />ROGER B. SHORT, P.E.
<br />.DUANEW. ELLIOTT, P.E.
<br />'N; E. HENDRICKSON,P.E:
<br />
<br />WilBUR R. UEaEN()W~ P.E~
<br />I. M. PETERSON, P,E; ,-.~ ,'~
<br />DONALD E, LUND, P:E, -
<br />GARY It GRAV;.P.E., ;, '. _ _,
<br />LEONARD C NEWQUIST,P.E.
<br />DONALDG. CHI~JStOfFERSfN,P.{:
<br />
<br />July 27, 1972
<br />
<br />BE: ARDEN BttLS~MtNNESOTA
<br />APPORTIONKENTS,OF ASSESSMENT
<br />'OUR FILE NO. 6910 ~.':~
<br />
<br />Peterson & Popovich
<br />Attorneys at Law
<br />,314 Kinne80ta Building
<br />St. Paul. Minnesota 55101
<br />
<br />Gentlemen:
<br />
<br />~ ~
<br />Enclosed are Apportiomnellts of Assessment for cer tain . parcels witbin.~"e
<br />Villege of Arden Hills abbtting County Road E2 west of old trunk n1g~ay
<br />No. 10. We have noted that there is an error in the asseSsmetit roll,l'or'
<br />Water Main Improvement 68-2 which we have corrected on, the enclosed ;. ',.
<br />apportionments. We noted that all of the parcels involved llre ~edb"tll1e
<br />Partridge Construction Company, and we have adv1se4 Mrs. Lorra!.e'St~ist
<br />of the problem in our letter of June 7, 1972.
<br />
<br />Thfil assessment discrepancies involve Parcels No. 02005 and 040 78, The
<br />seeessment roll ahowsthe' 370-foot frontage asseSSlllent ,levied agU1I8tPa;rce; " .
<br />040..,78 whereas the ssaesament againat thia parcel should actually be 18Sft';)Il"~
<br />feet with the remaining 185 front feet lwied against Parcel 02005.
<br />
<br />The, resulting assessments are as folloWs:
<br />
<br />1. Parcel 020 05 waa originally asaeased 670' fro,nt 'feet at $5 ~rfoot
<br />plua 1.6 acrea at $350 per Acre. Thfil assessment following the'
<br />correction is now 855 front ffilet at $5 per foot and }.6 seres at.
<br />$350 per acre.
<br />
<br />2. Parcel No. 040 78wasorig1na1ly assessed, at 370 front fe,et at $5
<br />per foot and the corrected assessment, is '185 ,front feet at '5 pe;!;'
<br />foot.
<br />
|