Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />/. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />VILLAGE OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> <br />t <br />.~ <br />, <br />1 <br />\ <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 71-47 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RE VILLAGE POLICY ON <br />ASSESSMENT RATES FOR SEWER AND <br />WATER IMPROVEMENTS <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at the request of the Council, the Arden Hili s <br />FInance Committee has directed a study of the practices and <br />vi I lage experience regarding the cost of water and sanitary <br /> <br />sewer Improvements in the Village and the assessments charged <br /> <br />benefited properties by reason of such Improvements, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS said sub-committee has submitted its report, <br />dated August 10, 1971, to the Finance CommIttee, which has been <br /> <br />duly referred by the Finance Committee to the Councl I, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS the Councl I recognizes that a porti~n of the <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />cost of water and sanitary sewer. Improvements should be borne <br /> <br />as a charge against general taxes, since there is a definite <br /> <br />benefit therefrom to the Village as a whole, but the Council <br />is further of the opinion that a substantial portion of such <br /> <br />costs should be borne by assessments levied against the benefited <br /> <br />property, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS the Council notes that construction costs have sub- <br /> <br />stantlally increased, and accordingly the present policy of the <br /> <br />Council wIth respect to assessment. charges should be revised, <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as fol lows: <br /> <br />I. The aforesaid report of the Finance Committee Is <br /> <br />hereby accepted and approved. <br /> <br />2. Since the acreage assessment figures are presumed to be <br /> <br />related to Increased value benefits accruing to such property, <br /> <br />it Is recommended that, In the future, such charges not be <br /> <br />credited to future front-foot assessments. <br /> <br />3. Future improvements, which are essentially for core <br /> <br />facilitIes (such as storage, pumping, etc.l, should have their <br /> <br />costs borne entirely via general taxes because these benefit <br /> <br />all taxpayers alike. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />..;.,.l<.~._.'~"""""'~'~' .. <br /> <br />''i}.' <br />:,;J< <br />