My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
78-078
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
78-078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:14 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:45:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. PEDERSON: You were talking about 17 lots being <br />assessed the $200,000 and you said there's a possibility of more. <br />Who owns the other two from 17 to 19? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I don't know the owners - I believe <br />Mr. Amble owns these. There are 20 lots, and subtracting this, <br />this and this makes 17 - two more full assessment meaning sewer, <br />watermain and street would be these two, and this one potential <br />for street only. <br /> <br />lolR. PEDERSON: Who owns those? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I believe Mr. Amble owns these. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: The Council has to decide who gets <br />assessed and they're saying the other two affecting Mr. Amble <br />might be considered, and the dher one might be considered - just <br />giving us the full set of information. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR WOODBURN: Any further connuents? COIIlIllents of the <br />Council, or questions? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: Mr. Christoffersen - or Mr. Miller, <br />if we assumed this was the best '\\lay of enabling the development <br />with the area to be developed, but chose not to extend the north- <br />south leg of Amble until such time as say Mr. Amble's property was <br />developed, what would be the ramifications of just proceeding to <br />install the east-west part at this time? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I guess I would recommend, as long as <br />you're constructing, to at least get it down to this point <br />primarily because it would be difficult then to go back in and <br />construct this piece and actually assess it against the develop- <br />ment that's occurring at this time. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: Even if you took it to the southern <br />boundary of this property it would mean until the other area is <br />developed there would be no other access to Nursery Hill Court. <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: I would point out if that were the direction _ <br />taken that the tax forfeit land should also be reserved, otherwise <br />you have that problem in the future, so if that would be the <br />option taken,which we had discussed - determined it was better for <br />resolution of the entire problem to build it at this time - but <br />that portion of the right-of-way should be reserved for the future <br />and that would leave only the Amble Lane and that would be the <br />only missing portion. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN WINGERI': Are you responding to just the road now, <br />because I suppose the utilities have to go through there. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I would assume that the storm drainage - <br />we would have to provide some kind of outlet to this pond. The <br />sanitary sewer could dead~end at that point and the watermain to <br />dead-end, but I point out to you you're ending up with a watermain <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.