My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
08-28-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2023 3:57:10 PM
Creation date
8/24/2023 4:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING —10A <br />'It <br />,ARZEN HILLS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: August 28, 2023 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br />Dave Perrault, City Administrator <br />FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director <br />SUBJECT: Planning Case #23-013 — Public Hearing Required <br />Applicant: City of Arden Hills <br />Request: Zoning Code Amendments — Chapter 13, Section 1325.05 - Design <br />Standards, Subdivision 4.1) — Fencing <br />Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: <br />N/A N/A N/A <br />Council Should Consider <br />Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 23-014, a proposal for Zoning <br />Ordinance Amendments to Chapter 13, Section 1325.05, Subd. 4.1), Fences to identify <br />criteria between a temporary and permanent fence in all zoning districts as well as set a <br />maximum height for fences in the Business and Industrial Zoning Districts. The City <br />Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda <br />Item 11 A. <br />Background <br />At their February 21st work session, the City Council had a preliminary discussion on if, or how, <br />City ordinances may be restrictive to residents wanting to remodel or add -on to their home. City <br />staff was directed to survey neighboring cities to compare Arden Hills' residential setback <br />requirements. Additionally, city staff was asked to assemble a list of previously identified code <br />amendments to allow for further Council discussion to occur on the prioritization of amendment <br />reviews. <br />City staff brought back the requested information to the City Council at their April 17th meeting. <br />Staff provide a list of ordinance amendments that were previously tasked to proceed directly to <br />the Planning Commission for the first review once a Senior Planner was onboard and as staff <br />time allowed. While others would need to be brought back to the City Council for further <br />discussion and direction at a future work session. Below is the list of ordinance amendments that <br />were part of the City Council work session discussion: <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.