77-051 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. each whether there should be an aggregate or bituminous base. Depending on which way you go, those costs range from $109,983 on a 36 foot aggregate base to $112,550 on a 36 foot bituminous base. Xf it goes to 44 feet, it's $122,616 for the aggregate base, and $121,263 for the bituminous base. I Included in those costs are certain contingencies and extra costs that are explained in the report which are in line with current standards in approaching it. The one thing that is left out is the acquisition of right-of-way so far as the cost, but there is a 15% overall extra cost plus a 10% contingency so within those figures the costs of the right-of-way, depending on what it would be and what you do with the underpass, it will come out approximately at the figures that we end up with. On the other hand, even if you included all of these things and added the right-of-way. we can still exceed this cost by 25% without starting over again, but X wish to point it out so that you know of the contingencies. . There are certain aspects to be considered in view of what we did on County Road F. Number one, what should be the assessment charge? Should it be 100% or something less. If the cost is based on 100%, and we want to give the worst figure, if it's a 36 foot eggregage roadway it would be $49.99 a foot. If it's a bituminous 36 foot roadway, it's $51.16 a foot. If it's a 44 foot roadway with aggregate base it's $55.73 a foot, and if it's bituminous it would be $55.12 a foot. If the council" and that depends on how the hearing goes - would reduce that to 80/20, those costs would be reduced accordingly, but for purposes of the feasibility hearing we have been assuming 100% costs. . The second aspect to consider would be the length of the assessment. As you know, we had quite a discussion on County Road F - 10, 15 or 20 years, and perhaps we should hear from the people who petitioned as to what period of time they prefer. Xf you follow what you did on county Road P, I .