Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — AUGUST 14, 2023 5 <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained on July 24, 2023, the City Council <br />adopted Resolution 2023-038 receiving the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing to <br />consider proposed improvements for the 2024 PMP Street and Utility Improvements Project. <br />Projects involving special assessments generally require two public hearings commonly known as <br />an Improvement Hearing and an Assessment Hearing. The subject hearing for August 14 is the <br />improvement hearing. The purpose of the improvement hearing is for the City Council to discuss <br />a specific local improvement before ordering it done. The second public hearing is the assessment <br />hearing which is scheduled after the project has received contractor bids to provide property <br />owners an opportunity to express concerns about the actual special assessments. He stated <br />engineering consultant Brad Fisher with Bolton & Menk would be presenting further information <br />regarding this item to the Council. <br />Brad Fisher, Bolton & Menk, commented further on the scope of work that would be completed <br />for the 2024 Street and Utility Improvement Project. He described the infrastructure maintenance <br />work that would be completed noting new parallel parking bays would be added along Royal Lane <br />and Floral Park. He discussed the differences between a reclamation project versus a mill and <br />overlay. The water quality and pond cleanout improvements included in the project were <br />reviewed, along with the train and retaining wall rehab. He provided an overview of the comments <br />that were received at the public open house that was held on August 8. The estimated total project <br />costs and special assessments were discussed and staff recommended the Council hold an <br />improvement hearing. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how good the estimate was. <br />Mr. Fisher commented on the process that was used to estimate this project, noting this was <br />based on the cost for recent projects with an inflation factor for next year. <br />Councilmember Holden requested further information on what residents would and would not be <br />paying for. <br />Mr. Fisher reported residents would be paying for 50% of the road improvements while the City <br />would be paying for 100% of all utility work. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned how the City would address the driveway and roadway <br />grading concerns. <br />Mr. Fisher explained the roadway grade would remain as is. He noted this project would only <br />include spot replacement for curb and gutter. <br />Mayor Grant inquired how mailboxes will be handled. <br />Mr. Fisher stated the contractor was responsible for maintaining access to mailboxes and trash <br />services. When these services can't be maintained, temporary services have to be arranged by the <br />contractor. <br />Councilmember Monson asked how long the street reconstruction project would take. <br />