Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />Resolution No. 80-52, Approval of Chapter 612, <br />Section 7 of the 1980 Laws (Membership in RCLLG and Dues Based <br />on Metropolitan Council Population Estimates) <br />Hanson moved that Council adopt Resolution No. 80-52. Wingert <br />seconded the motion and asked the ramifications if not adopted. <br /> <br />Concern was expresaed relative to having the watershed <br />districts, conservation districts, school district <br />etc. included in this kind of body. <br /> <br />McNiesh npted that tf Council does not act on the Resolution, it <br />will be assumed that it has been disapproved. <br /> <br />It was noted that the mixture of charters causes considerable <br />cross-purposes with the original purpose of the league, which was <br />to allow local governments to coordinate and cooperate amongst <br />themselves for legislation to aid municipalities; feels this mix- <br />ture subverts this purpose. <br /> <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />Motion did not carry (Hanson voting in favor of the motion, Wingert, <br />Crichton, Woodburn voting in opposition). <br /> <br />Reasons given for not adopting the Resolution were: <br /> <br />""UIIC~MI <br />DAJEU"'&'(f' 0 1. Dispari ty of interests in the groups, <br />2. The various charters, <br />3. The cross-purpose that may be shown <br />in the heterologous group. <br /> <br />(Copy to be sent to Mr. Tom Grundhoefer, Coordinator, RCLLG). <br />