Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH:' The question is, did.it get some benefit. <br />What the engineer has done is divide (inaudible). On the other <br />hand if you find it receives no benefit when the lots are <br />sold you can spread it against the four, but you must be <br />satisfied that all of the benefit is for the four remaining <br />lots. . <br /> <br />We have not sold any bonds on this either so obviously it <br />would be spread over 20 years with the maximum of 8% interest <br />charge. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: For the Council's benefit, this is <br />Hamline Avenue (indicating drawing) this is the location of <br />the house. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: That's 277 feet by 80 feet wide. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: This is lot No.2. It's hard to <br />determine - we're not certain where the services came in this <br />area. It was requested that the stubs be placed here for <br />safety sake. We discussed the mat 'fer with the owner before <br />placing the stubs so if the service is off Hamline (inaudible) <br />this lot there is available service here on this street. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN HANSON: I'm wondering if there's (inaudible) <br />that this lot No. 2 would benefit by the street. at least. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I would say under the new plat it <br />will benefit by the street. The old driveway, I believe, came <br />in in this location, is that correct? <br /> <br />MR.E. REUBEN SUNDBURG, 4234 N. Hamline: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: It was not on the city street. The <br />driveway did ex! t on Hamline Avenue through Lot No.1. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN WINGERT: Where was the sanitary, sewer? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: The sanitary sewer service - we were <br />trying to determine exactly where. I can't recall - one or the <br />other sanitary sewer or water came somewhere in the center of <br />this lot. It was difficult to determine and I believe the other <br />service came along the back property line somewhere. Rather <br />than place an easement across that property in the future <br />it was felt - we discussed the mat tar with the owners prior <br />to the placement of the stubs and gave him the option of placing <br />them or not and they took the option of placing them in, the event <br />there would be something come up where they would net like to <br />have any service" run through this property so they have been <br />stubbed in on this corner. This issue, since it's not with the <br />county, does not necessarily have to be resolved tonight. <br />