Laserfiche WebLink
<br />---. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN WOODBURN: At this point .I think I'd have to <br />look further because if the stub is of benefit because the owner <br />asked for it and, therefore, it must be of some potential <br />possible benefit or he wouldn't have asked for it. What both <br />these things did is allow Lot 1 to exist without the street . <br />there and (inaudible) <br /> <br />MR. l?OPOVICH: May I inquire - when water and sewer went <br />through on Hamline, the way Lot 2 where the house was <br />originally got that previous assessment, didn't 1 and S get <br />assessed because the water and sewer went by them in the previous <br />improvement. So wouldn I t the same thing apply te. them. <br />There was an assessment against 1 and S because they abutted. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: .I believe this property was a little <br />different shape than today but most likely the whole propert.y <br />was assessed on a front footage basis for sewer and water . <br />along Hamline, plus acreage. The only portion "that may not <br />have been assessed if the property extended into the swampy <br />area, there may not have been an assessment in the swampy area <br />on a front foot basis, but I'm reasonably sure there was an <br />assessment for sewer and water along Hamline for Lots'S and 1. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: That being the case, and that's why I <br />asked the question, Lot 2 is not the only one that was <br />assessed before. I would recommend to the Council that you <br />adopt the assessment for $47.,000 against the entir.e parcel <br />and the engineer can come back and determine what 'the assess- <br />ments were before, and when the apportionment comes in you <br />can make (inaudible) Mr. Malik can receive a notice when the <br />apportionment notices come out. I'd feel safer' doing-it that <br />way than make the subdividing decision tonight. <br /> <br />, COUNCILMAN WOODBURN: Confusing to me - a slightly con.,. <br />fusing issue. I don't remember seeing this happen before where a <br />house has been built where there's no lot. How did it happen <br />this didn't get filed, and what was the basis for that~ I <br />suppose it's legal. <br /> <br />MRS. MC NIESH: It's filed, but not in the computer. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Just a delay in the machinery. The law <br />requires us to send notice to those last appearing of record <br />30 days before the hearing. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: We will continue on and finish this up, <br />and ask the Clerk if there are any written objections or <br />questions. <br /> <br />MRS. MC NIESH: None, your, Honor. <br /> <br />)!AYOR CREPEAU: Now we're supposed to open the meeting <br />for comments. If there are no changes in the assessment roll, <br />