My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
80-038
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
80-038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:22 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 3:46:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />16 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: Anyone else have a question or comment? <br />Anyone from the Council have a question or comment on any <br />sllbject? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN HANSON: J: have some information that hasn't <br />been discussed that I'd like to add. In discussing these <br />matters with our engineer, Don Ohristoffersen, he informs me <br />that County Road Eis a county State Aid Road and as such, we <br />could expect to get some help from the state on the variety. <br />of improvements on that road, mainly they would (inaudible) <br />to pay partially the cost of traffic signals and any street. <br />lighting at intersections, sidewalks that were added for <br />safety,. and cost of relocating driveways, the cost of building <br />the medians, and any acquisition of right-of-way cost. <br /> <br />Looking at the Interim Design that the committee <br />recoIDIIiended, the three items that are appropriate within that <br />grouping would be the roadway expense of $28,500, the sidewalk <br />of $31,900, and the street lighting of $110,000 which adds up <br />to $170,400. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The other information I would like to add is that con- <br />sidering all of those things are necessary from a safety <br />standpoint, that we could utilize our Municipal State Aid <br />account of Arden Hills if the county didn't see fit to participate <br />and at the present time our account with the state' includes an <br />amount of $223,000, rough figures, which is available at this <br />time. I don't know how much greater it might be next year <br />by the time the project would be paid for, but 'it would be <br />considerably higher. We have some plans to usei' that money, but <br />we're getting to the point in that relationship where 'we're going <br />to lose some (inaudible) if we don't proceed to (inaudible) . <br />so I think it looks practical to use part or all' of that aid money <br />for those three items which would be roughly one-third of the total <br />cost, and then if we followed the recommendation of the committee <br />,to share the balance, it would end up abGut $184,000 that we would <br />be paying out of the general taxes and if we got it down to that <br />(inaudible) I'd certainly recommend 15 years rather than 20. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: Thank you. Anyone else? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: I had a couple of questions., One of <br />them is to Mr. Van Wormer. In the (inaudible) of discussion of <br />the potential new road into (inaudible) out of Mr. Carroll's, <br />through the St. Paul Book (inaudible) I think that both Mr. <br />Carroll and Mr. Engelbert indicated a general agreement. <br /> <br />MR. VAN WORMER:' I said as a concept (inaudible) agreement. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: The other question - I didn't quite <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.