My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
09-25-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2023 3:41:36 PM
Creation date
9/22/2023 3:36:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — AUGUST 28, 2023 7 <br />compare Arden Hills' residential setback requirements. Additionally, city staff was asked to <br />assemble a list of previously identified code amendments to allow for further Council discussion <br />to occur on the prioritization of amendment reviews. City staff brought back the requested <br />information to the City Council at their April 17th meeting. Staff provide a list of ordinance <br />amendments that were previously tasked to proceed directly to the Planning Commission for the <br />first review once a Senior Planner was onboard and as staff time allowed. While others would <br />need to be brought back to the City Council for further discussion and direction at a future work <br />session. Staff reviewed the proposed ordinance amendments. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained the City Council consensus was to proceed <br />with the amendments as outlined. Staff was directed to bring forward the fence ordinance <br />amendments to the Planning Commission for the first review and to hold a public hearing. <br />Following the public hearing, the draft ordinance language with recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission would be brought to the City Council for subsequent discussion and adoption. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe reviewed the Overview of Ordinance Amendments in <br />further detail with the Council and reported the Planning Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioner <br />Mitchell was absent) to recommend approval of Planning Case 23-014 with amendments. The <br />Commission recommended increasing the duration for a temporary fence from 120 days to 150 <br />days and added wording that identifies fencing utilized at a construction site would also be an <br />exception to the temporary fencing provision. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if the Planning Commission discussed the height of residential <br />fences. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe reported the Planning Commission did not discuss <br />this. She noted residential fences would be limited to six feet at this time. She indicated PUD's <br />would allow for applicants to seek flexibility for a taller fence. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned how the City would monitor or enforce temporary fences. <br />She recommended temporary fences be allowed from November 1 to March 31 versus allowing <br />them for 150 days. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated a specific number of days allows for seasonal <br />summer fences for gardens, along with winter snow fences. She reported fences would be <br />investigated based on complaints from neighbors. <br />Councilmember Holden inquired if there was any provision that requires the finished side of the <br />fence to be placed outwards. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe commented there could be language that states <br />subject to all other fencing provisions and this would require the finished side to be outwards. She <br />reported all maintenance concerns with temporary fencing would be covered under current City <br />Code language. <br />Mayor Grant questioned if rebar can be put into the ground on December 1 and be taken out by <br />April 30. He asked if 150 days for a snow fence works. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.