My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
08-21-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2023 9:23:20 AM
Creation date
9/26/2023 9:23:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—AUGUST 21, 2023 10 <br /> Councilmember Monson stated this could be further addressed once a density scenario was <br /> selected. <br /> Mayor Grant asked if the AUAR had been updated. <br /> City Administrator Perrault stated this had not been done. <br /> Mayor Grant believed it would be beneficial to have a model or rendering of the site at each of <br /> the different density scenarios. <br /> City Administrator Perrault indicated it was too early to have this level of detail from the <br /> developer. He hoped the Council could land on one of the density scenarios at this meeting, either <br /> 1789 or 1960. <br /> Mayor Grant recommended the Council not overlook how this project, at the different density <br /> scenarios, would impact transportation and schools. <br /> City Administrator Perrault reported the County was looking further into the transportation <br /> impacts, but noted the adjacent roads were overbuilt in anticipation of this development. He <br /> explained he has had a number of conversations with the school district and noted they could <br /> handle the additional density. <br /> Councilmember Fabel stated it was his understanding the school district was anxious to get more <br /> students from Arden Hills into the schools. <br /> Councilmember Holden indicated she would support the Council further discussing this topic <br /> given the fact she was just provided these numbers at this meeting. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated she thought the Council would be trying to come to a consensus <br /> on the density at this meeting, but perhaps the Council was working to better understand the <br /> numbers. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the MOU with the developer. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang summarized the conversation of the Council noting she understood home <br /> ownership was important. <br /> E. Preliminary 2024 General Fund Budget <br /> Finance Director Bauman stated annually, City staff prepares and submits a preliminary budget <br /> to the City Council for review and feedback. Each department provided their respective forecasts <br /> for this budget. The proposed 2024 budget is $6,226,460, an increase of$696,280 or 12.6%. For <br /> the purpose of this discussion, there is a 13.2% ($621,270) tax levy increase reflected in the <br /> budget, all for the General Fund. As presented, the General Fund Budget is underfunded by <br /> $218,260 ($160,760 + $57,500), which is more than the budget shortfall projected in the 2023 <br /> budget of$160,760. This practice is not sustainable in the long term. Direction given at the July <br /> 2023 work session was to apply $57,500 of the 2022 fund balance to some one time operational <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.