Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />an assessment on the property, the north property line was used <br />and not the south property line - we just followed the property <br />line (inaudible). We used the dimension along the north property <br />line, which was 300.4 feet. We treated the easement as public <br />property. <br /> <br />MR. LUND: It's not an easement though. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: It is public property because it belongs <br />to the State of Minnesota. We treated it as public property. <br />Normally, in this particular case (inaudible) right-of-way and <br />the existing street is throughout the rest of the portion. In <br />our view, the frontage can be made use of. If it is not occupied <br />by storm sewer, a portion of that property could revert back to <br />the property owner also. <br /> <br />MR. LUND: Our frontage is actually Dunlap Street for that <br />particular property. We have no need for that road whatsoever. <br /> <br />MR. EUGENE COLESTOCK, President of Hunter Sales, 3737 North <br />Lexington Avenue: I would like to add once more - I've heard all <br />the objections that were raised on the previous issue as far as <br />sewer is concerned and they apply as far as the road is concerned. <br />It's my concensus, in the industrial park, that the road has <br />served no purpose for anyone in the industrial park. We were <br />happy, we were content, we were pleased, we had all of the access <br />we needed (inaudible) areas that we wanted to be in in the indus- <br />trial park. I would like to reiterate that the same objections <br />apply all the way. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Anything further from the Council? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN McALLISTER: I would like to ask the attorney <br />or Mr. Colestock - are you saying you have no benefit at all? <br /> <br />MR. COLESTOCK: That is correct. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: We have the same options that we had in <br />the previous project. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN McALLISTER: I guess what I'm hearing from the <br />audience is they don't feel they should be assessed anything for <br />for this improvement. We can't go along with that because we <br />have to assess a minimum amount because of the bond business. <br />In view of no alternative (inaudible) numbers we have been looking <br />at for a year. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn closed the hearing. Following a discussion <br /> <br />of the amount to be assessed against Mr. Clifford Lund's property, <br /> <br />Councilman Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved <br /> <br />its adoption: <br /> <br />6 <br />