Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. POPOVICH: We had the feasibility hearings a year ago <br />and the same people got notices then as for tonight. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Is there any reason the Bosses (inaudible). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHARLOTTE McNIESH: I would have to look back to see where <br />the notices were mailed. I believe they were mailed one. When <br />we mailed the notice for this hearing, the address on the County <br />rolls was their home address and we got the letter back saying it <br />wasn't deliverable. We happened to know that Mr. and Mrs. Boss <br />were living in Sutton Place so after we got it back - because it <br />wasn't forwarded - we sent another notice. But I don't believe <br />you were at Sutton Place a year ago, were you? <br /> <br />MRS. BOSS: We were in May. <br /> <br />MAYOR t..OODBURN: <br />your house. <br /> <br />(Inaudible) even though it was addressed to <br /> <br />MRS. McNIESH: I don't believe we got one back at the time <br />of the feasibility hearing. I'll have to check that. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Just so we don't get off on a tangent on the <br />notice - the law says you can just make a good faith effort on <br />sending the notice and whether notice is received or not - that <br />doesn't vitiate the proceedings. Obviously you hope everyone will <br />get it, but there is an exculpatory phrase as to the law. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: All we can do is try, but it's still nice <br />to know that everybody got notice. (Inaudible) ask Mr. Colestock <br />to have the last word. Is there anything else the Council wants <br />to add? Mr. Colestock, you may have the last word. <br /> <br />MR. COLESTOCK: You caught me unprepared. <br />stand the situation from what the engineer just <br />plan, as far as the distribution of storm water <br />ongoing just parallel of 694. Is that right? <br /> <br />Well, as I under- <br />said, the original <br />is concerned, was <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: <br />694 on the north side - <br />Avenue. That's the way <br /> <br />The original drainage did not parallel <br />it flowed to the east and down Lexington <br />it was before the improvement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. COLESTOCK: As that situation stands now, what I see <br />developing is - at least for the village - a claim is going to be <br />raised that with the development of new properties and building <br />of new buildings and new facilities in the industrial park - you <br />are contending that this system is going to be necessary to take <br />care of the drainage problems generated by 100% utilization of <br />the industrial park. Is that correct? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Are you talking just the industrial <br />park south of the freeway? <br /> <br />~ffi. COLESTOCK: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That's correct. <br /> <br />21 <br />