82-046 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . ,. I have another letter from Tri-State Land Company objecting to the assessments because the storm sewer improvement does not benefit Tri-State Land Company's property. The assessment deprives the protestant of said property without due process of law in violation of the U. S. constitution and constitution of the state of Minnesota. The proposed method of spreading the cost is arbitrary and capricious, unjust, discriminatory and in- equitable. The assessment is not properly made under Minnesota law and they request that all their property be excluded from any assessment. I have a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Boss, who are objecting to the assessment. They say it is for a new drainage system of which they were never advised. They feel the property has been damaged by the new drainage system rather than helped and address - instead of a small drainage ditch at the edge of their property it's been widened and deepened and some trees cut down. They object to the holding pond at the back of their property and comment on the proposed development of the site which was before the Planning Commission and Council recently for an office-warehouse. They think they are being treated very badly by the City after being good citizens for 22 years. I have an individual letter from A & D Development company objecting to the assessment and again saying there was no benefit conferred, speaking of the road. There is suitable access on Red Fox Road. In the event there is a benefit, of which they contend there is none, would be far less than the proposed assess- ment. We have a letter from Donald V. Roberts, President of Starco, objecting to the assessments that affect 1120 and 1140 Red Fox Road. They were charged for a storm sewer when Red Fox Road was built and don't see why they are being charged again. They are also against the storm sewer assessment. We have a letter from Scott Roberts objecting to the assess- ment at 3771-87 North Lexington. It states that the former drainage ditch in front of the property adequately took care of any storm water problems. Asked to be recorded as against the impro ve men t. Don Roberts of Roberts Construction feels the improvement wasn't necessary and he shouldn't be assessed. He wants to be recorded as against the assessment. R. L. Gould Company - we feel the existing road and sewer were more than adequate for the industrial park and see no need for a physical revision as property owners along Grey Fox Road do not benefit from either the new roadway or the storm sewer. No assessment should be made. Hunter Sales, representinq Eugene Colestock, Christine Colestock and Hunter Sales - should be no assessments made for the roadway or sewer for anybody in the industrial park. Again, the same thing - the existing road and sewer were adequate and they object to any assessment. I think that's all. 4