Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 7 <br />Mayor Grant said he didn't mean Council shouldn't be recommending topics, he meant that he <br />didn't know if a formal Council Liaison was needed any more. He thought topics like "how to <br />keep deer out of my yard" were a Google search and he felt the newsletter should be information <br />about the city they probably wouldn't get off a Google search. He knew there are some articles <br />that the county requires be put in. <br />Senior Communications Coordinator Cardona explained that a topic like "what to do with <br />dead animals" was driven from resident inquiries and a request from Public Works, and that <br />would be the type of thing he would like defined. Is that a topic that wouldn't be appropriate even <br />though it was resident driven? <br />Mayor Grant said he understood that topic as it was more local and you might not find the <br />information on a Google search. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said she has submitted ideas to staff or Councilmember Fabel but she <br />felt there was no process for committees to submit information for the newsletter or Facebook. <br />Her preference was to continue have a Council Liaison for communications. She would like to <br />see a series about the Public Works department. <br />Councilmember Monson felt the Council's involvement should be limited to topics only, they <br />should be avoiding politics and topics should be decided by staff or non -political topics from <br />Council. She didn't think they needed a Council Liaison but ideas could be filtered through staff. <br />She would be OK with staff starting over with topics that are included. The deadline suggested <br />was fine. She thought staff should have the final say on what topics are included unless directed <br />by Council. Feedback should be provided through a work session but be fairly limited. She has no <br />desire to write articles for the newsletter as that is where she fears you get politics, and staff <br />should have the final review. <br />Mayor Grant said he has also heard from residents that the newsletter has become fluffier and <br />doesn't have quite the information they want. Residents would like to know more about TCAAP. <br />He felt the focus of the newsletter should be what information residents want to know. He thought <br />topics should be those that relate to the city with the exception of information the County <br />provides. It should include Benchmarks and cost of things being approved. Council and <br />department directors should submit topics. He was OK with the proposed deadline. He felt staff <br />should have final say, and he didn't want to write articles as it was easy to get political. He <br />thought Council should proof the newsletter. <br />Senior Communications Coordinator Cardona said who has the final say before going to the <br />printer is usually the City Administrator or the Communications Manager. <br />Councilmember Holden agreed with Councilmember Monson. She said some of the big topics <br />now are Round Lake, Lexington Avenue, the roundabout and Floral Park. She felt proofing was <br />important and agreed with 10 issues a year. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said she'd love information like the Restoration Advisory Board <br />(RAB) is meeting on Tuesday and they're talking about the plumes. She would like to see Parks <br />and Rec opportunities highlighted like volunteer programs at Parkshore and Bark & Rec. She <br />thought department directors could submit topics, along with Council and staff that are <br />