Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 9 <br />City Administrator Perrault reported this surplus was typically placed in the PIR Fund. <br />Councilmember Rousseau stated she supported the preliminary levy being set at 12.55%. <br />Councilmember Fabel commented on how labor movement has become more active in recent <br />days. He believed this current state should be considered when going into union negotiations. <br />Because of the uncertainties surrounding the union negotiations, he recommended the preliminary <br />levy be set at 14.7%. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated the union negotiations were not just about money, but rather <br />the City offered other benefits such as having every Friday afternoon off in the summer. She <br />commented on how City staff appreciated having summer hours and ample vacation hours earned. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she could support going down to the 12.55% levy increase with <br />the assumed budget surplus money from 2023. She indicated she was concerned with the union <br />negotiations and where those numbers would end up. <br />Mayor Grant commented the Personnel Committee met regarding making Arden Hills a bit more <br />flexible and enjoyable for employees. He discussed how Consent Agenda Item B offered <br />employees more flexibility when it came to scheduling and how employees dress for their day. He <br />believed this set Arden Hills apart and made it more enjoyable for working. He reported he has <br />been on the City Council for the past 23 years and he has seen surpluses occurring for 23 years. <br />He commented on how the City did not spend 100% of the budget for 100% of the budgeted <br />items. He stated he believed in levying an amount of dollars that closely reflected the amount that <br />would be spent. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if when the City budgeted over all these years and hadn't spent <br />the money, was it because the City didn't have people to exercise the goals and visions for the <br />budget? She questioned why the City regularly has not hit its budget. <br />Councilmember Holden stated every time Council set the levy, it was set lower than what the <br />budget asked for. She noted that of course being a Director, she would always ask for more <br />money than was needed and that you pad your budget some because you don't know. She said that <br />at the same time, these are estimates. She went on to say that the maintenance schedule is a <br />maintenance schedule, it's not a for -sure. She gave the example that Public Works may have a <br />truck that has had no issues except for a little rust on the bottom, and they want to replace it. The <br />Council can say no and schedule the replacement out another year or two. She noted the Council <br />has the prerogative to say yes or no to everything that comes before them. <br />Councilmember Holden stated that many times the City has been fully staffed but sometimes <br />revenue does come from not funding a salary in the case of a staff vacancy. She noted she believes <br />an approximately $10 million dollar field house would be built. <br />Mayor Grant discussed how the City has a policy in place that requires the City to have 50% of <br />its budget on hand. He commented on how this assists the City in covering expenditures in <br />between receiving property tax payments, noting these were only made to the City two times a <br />