Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />gets sanitary sewer, that assessment cost will be $4,830.00; <br />watermain will be $3,301.00; street will be $6",320.00: and <br />storm sewer will be $1,161.00; so if you got all of that, the <br />total cost would be approximately $15,612.00 per lot. As I <br />remember from the feasibility report, there are about 43 lots <br />that receive that type of improvement. It would be our recom- <br />mendation that for those - assuming the assessment - that we <br />ought to not assess over longer than a 15 year period because <br />of present market conditions. But for that portion that lies <br />within the addition, because it's totally a developer matter, <br />the Council may wish to consider a development agreement <br />where those total assessments are paid in a three to five <br />year period. I don't know if the developer is here, but that <br />is one item that you ought to consider because it does affect <br />the amount of financing you do and how fast (inaudible) in <br />the actual development itself. If's possible to have different <br />assessment formulas within the same improvement because of the <br />difference between where there are existing properties as <br />compared to those that are being requested by the development <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Assuming it is assessed, as the greater portion of the <br />project will be, and we're assuming 100% assessment here <br />unless there are some allowances that the Council makes at <br />the assessment hearing, that will be spread over a period of <br />time determined by the development agreement, or not to <br />exceed 15 years at the maximum interest rate, which would be <br />1% more than the bond issue or not more than 12%, as permitted <br />by the Local Improvement Code. Assuming the project is done <br />in 1982, we will hold our assessment hearing next fall and <br />collections should commence in 1983. This is one of the <br />projects thatwoulq be included in the proposed bond issue <br />if it was approved and you decided to go ahead. That issue <br />is scheduled for sale in late January or early February. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Mr. Christliffersen, 43 lots were men- <br />tioned as possible assessable lots, or involved lots. Which <br />ones are in the development? Do you have those figures with <br />you? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: The lots within the development are <br />outlined by a heavy. dark line and there are five or six po- <br />tential lots outside, depending on how the property is <br />divided. When I say five or six, there are two potential <br />lots here, two or three along the east side of Old Highway 10, <br />and that depends strictly on the development and, the way the <br />land is divided. There is a long, deep lot which exists as <br />one lot right now and there's potential for another redivision <br />of this land, creating a lot fronting on Arden Oaks Drive. <br />Currently that is counted as one. That number could be <br />changed though. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Mrs. Zehm, are there any written com- <br />ments on the development? <br /> <br />3 <br />