11-08-23 PC Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 4, 2023 8 recommended the language be reconsidered to include the language from the Minnesota Solar Model Ordinance. She commented on how south facing rooflines were with most efficient way to capture solar energy. She requested clarification in Item 3(b) regarding the height of panels above a roof. She discussed how some roof systems are raised up when installed. She suggested five feet be allowed. She asked that there be a change to Section 4 – Coverage, under Section A. She questioned why the City was setting a limit of 80% coverage for south facing or flat roofs. She urged staff to update this outdated language noting Minnesota State building code addresses the percentage of roof coverage. She commented further on how Minnesota State building code addresses structural concerns when it comes to solar energy systems. Commissioner Wicklund asked if all installers of ground mounted systems were governed by Minnesota rule codes or statutes, and this addressed wind loads for structures. Ms. DeMarre reported this was the case. She explained each new code that comes out on a yearly basis addresses wind load for ground mounted structures. Commissioner Weber indicated this code specifically addresses ground mounted solar systems. He inquired if the Minnesota State Building Code addresses ground mounted systems. Ms. DeMarre discussed how ground mounted systems were addressed within the State building code. There being no additional comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. Chair Vijums commented his concerns regarding power lines would be satisfied by Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota building code. The Commission was in agreement. Chair Vijums indicated his other concern was with visibility and screening. He stated he was under the impression staff should investigate this portion of code further. Chair Wicklund recommended staff also consider if it would be appropriate to add NR-1, NR-2 and NR-3 within the TRC to this zoning code amendment. He stated he supported the expansion of solar in Arden Hills. However, because there was no urgency, he supported the matter being tabled to allow staff and the Commission to work through some of the concerns that have been brought up. Chair Vijums supported this recommendation and thanked staff for all of their efforts on the drafted code amendment language. Commissioner Weber reported staff referenced the Minnesota Solar Model Ordinance within the zoning code amendment. He explained his understanding of this language was that homeowners had the right to pursue the ownership of solar energy. He was of the opinion neighbors could not limit a resident’s right to pursue solar energy. He asked for staff’s opinion on this matter. Senior Planner Fransen indicated this was staff’s interpretation when drafting the language for the proposed process of administrative approval for solar energy systems. Chair Vijums read the language the Applicant provided for the proposed zoning code amendment again for the record stating “ground mounted solar panels are not allowed unless their view is blocked to all parties concerned.”