Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Model Solar Ordinance 7 <br />IV. Permitted Accessory Use - Solar energy systems are a permitted accessory use in all zoning districts <br />where structures of any sort are allowed, subject to certain requirements as set forth below. Solar carports <br />and associated electric vehicle charging equipment are a permitted accessory use on surface parking lots <br />in all districts regardless of the existence of another building. Solar energy systems that do not meet the <br />following design standards will require a conditional use permit. <br />A. Height - Solar energy systems must meet the following height requirements: <br />1. Building- or roof- mounted solar energy systems shall not <br />exceed the maximum allowed height in any zoning district. <br />For purposes for height measurement, solar energy <br />systems other than building-integrated systems shall <br />be given an equivalent exception to height standards as <br />building-mounted mechanical devices or equipment. <br />2. Ground- or pole-mounted solar energy systems shall not <br />exceed 15 feet in height when oriented at maximum tilt. <br />3. Solar carports in non-residential districts shall not exceed <br />20 feet in height. <br />B. Set-back - Solar energy systems must meet the accessory <br />structure setback for the zoning district and primary land use <br />associated with the lot on which the system is located, except <br />as allowed below. <br />1. Roof- or Building-mounted Solar Energy Systems – The <br />collector surface and mounting devices for roof-mounted <br />solar energy systems shall not extend beyond the exterior <br />perimeter of the building on which the system is mounted <br />or built, unless the collector and mounting system has <br />been explicitly engineered to safely extend beyond the <br />edge, and setback standards are not violated. Exterior <br />piping for solar hot water systems shall be allowed to <br />extend beyond the perimeter of the building on a side-yard exposure. Solar collectors mounted on <br />the sides of buildings and serving as awnings are considered to be building-integrated systems and <br />are regulated as awnings. <br />2. Ground-mounted Solar Energy Systems - Ground-mounted solar energy systems may not extend <br />into the side-yard or rear setback when oriented at minimum design tilt, except as otherwise <br />allowed for building mechanical systems. <br />C. Visibility - Solar energy systems in residential districts shall be <br />designed to minimize visual impacts from the public right-of- <br />way, as described in C.1-3, to the extent that doing so does not <br />affect the cost or efficacy of the system. Visibility standards <br />do not apply to systems in non-residential districts, except for <br />historic building or district review as described in E. below. <br />Height - Rooftop System <br />This ordinance notes exceptions to the height <br />standard when other exceptions for rooftop <br />equipment are granted in the ordinance. <br />Communities should directly reference the <br />exception language rather than use the <br />placeholder language here. <br />Height - Ground or Pole Mounted System <br />This ordinance sets a 15-foot height limit, <br />which is typical for residential accessory uses. <br />Some communities allow solar to be higher <br />than other accessory uses in order to enable <br />capture of the lot’s solar resource when <br />lots and buildings are closer together. An <br />alternative is to balance height with setback, <br />allowing taller systems if set back farther– for <br />instance, an extra foot of height for every <br />extra two feet of setback. In rural (or large <br />lot) areas, solar resources are unlikely to be <br />constrained by trees or buildings on adjacent <br />lots and the lot is likely to have adequate solar <br />resource for a lower (10-15 foot) ground- <br />mount application. <br />Visibility and Aesthetics <br />Aesthetic regulation should be tied to design <br />principles rather than targeted at a specific <br />land use. If the community already regulates <br />aesthetics in residential districts, this model <br />language provides guidance for balancing <br />between interests of property owners who <br />want to use their on-site solar resources and <br />neighbors concerned with neighborhood <br />character. Substantial evidence demonstrates <br />that solar installations have no effect on <br />property values of adjacent properties. But <br />where aesthetic regulation is used to protect <br />community character, these standards provide <br />balance between competing goals.