Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Model Solar Ordinance 10 <br />V. Principal Uses – Model Community encourages the <br />development of commercial or utility scale solar energy systems <br />where such systems present few land use conflicts with current <br />and future development patterns. Ground-mounted solar energy <br />systems that are the principal use on the development lot or lots <br />are conditional uses in selected districts. <br />A. Principal Use General Standards <br />1. Site Design <br />a. Set-backs – Community- and large-scale solar arrays <br />must meet the following setbacks: <br />1. Property line setback for buildings or structures in <br />the district in which the system is located, except as <br />other determined in 1.a.5 below. <br />2. Roadway setback of 150 feet from the ROW <br />centerline of State highways and CSAHs, 100 feet for <br />other roads, except as other determined in 1.a.5 below. <br />3. Housing unit setback of 150 feet from any existing <br />dwelling unit, except as other determined in 1.a.5 <br />below. <br />4. Setback distance should be measured from the edge <br />of the solar energy system array, excluding security <br />fencing, screening, or berm. <br />5. All setbacks can be reduced by 50% if the array is <br />fully screened from the setback point of measurement. <br />b. Screening – Community- and large-scale solar shall be <br />screened from existing residential dwellings. <br />1. A screening plan shall be submitted that identifies <br />the type and extent of screening. <br />2. Screening shall be consistent with Model <br />Community’s screening ordinance or standards <br />typically applied for other land uses requiring <br />screening. <br />3. Screening shall not be required along property lines <br />within the same zoning district, except where the <br />adjoining lot has an existing residential use. <br />4. Model Community may require screening where it determines there is a clear community <br />interest in maintaining a viewshed. <br />Screening <br />The community should consider limiting <br />screening of community- or large-scale solar <br />to where there is a visual impact from an <br />existing use, such as adjacent residential <br />districts or uses. Solar energy systems may <br />not need to be screened from adjacent lots <br />if those lots are in agricultural use, are non- <br />residential, or have low-intensity commercial <br />use. <br />Community-Scale Solar or Solar Gardens <br />Community solar systems differ from rooftop <br />or solar farm installations primarily in <br />regards to system ownership and disposition <br />of the electricity generated, rather than <br />land use considerations. There is, however, <br />a somewhat greater community interest <br />in community solar, and thus communities <br />should consider creating a separate land use <br />category. <br />This language limits the size of the garden to <br />ten acres, which is an installation of no more <br />than one MW of solar capacity. Communities <br />should tailor this size limit to community <br />standards, which may be smaller or larger. <br />Appropriate Setbacks <br />The community should consider balancing <br />set-back requirements and screening <br />requirements for principal use solar. Since the <br />primary impact to neighbors of large-scale <br />solar is visual, screening becomes less useful, <br />as the setbacks get larger (and vice versa). <br />The setback distances provided here are <br />general examples that should be modified to <br />be consistent with other setbacks already in <br />the ordinance. Excessive setbacks that are <br />unique to solar land uses, or that are similar <br />to high nuisance land uses such as industrial <br />uses or animal agriculture, are unjustified <br />given the low level of risk or nuisance posed <br />by the system.