Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COlJ:\fC1L MEETING YllNUTES <br />FEBRUARY 11,2002 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she could see the value oflegislative action. She noted she is <br />apprehensive about the decision of a development partnership <br /> <br />Councilmemher Larson asked for clarification on the acreage. Mayor Probst stated the Vento <br />plan had 1100 acres for parks and open spaces and 800 to 1000 acres for development. He noted <br />the National Guard's cun-ent proposal would only leave 500 acres outside of its control. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the City is giving up too much by agreeing to the land the <br />National Guard has left. He questioned whether they should use the figure suggested by the <br />Vento Plan. He stated it appeared the city is ceding that land to the National Guard. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that from the discussions and correspondences he felt any change would <br />unravel what they are trying to accomplish. He noted they could continue to work with the <br />1\ ational Guard to seek other parts of the property to seek other parts we think are impOliant. <br /> <br />Councill1lember Larson stated the language has a range from 500 to 800 acres. He noted he <br />would prefer to see just the higher figurc. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated they could easily remove the number atld just indicatc the remaining land. <br />He noted Representative McCullum wanted almost a legal description. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson agreed to deleting the number. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated thcy should phrase it as much as possible to work with the National <br />Guard. Shc noted thc l\ ational Guard is key to the City obtaining approval. Shc added that <br />perhaps they should mention the DNR. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the school district should be added as a part. Mayor Probst <br />responded he was not sure orthe school district's interest. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he is prepared to support the two resolutions. He noted the <br />Council has made a number of changes. He asked whether the Council could vote on them with <br />the understanding someone would fax the Councilmembers the rcvised Resolution. Hc stated <br />thcn the Councilmembcrs could indicate their approval and fax a copy back to staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated he would prefer to use email. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Larson concurred. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Lat'son moved and Councilmcmber Aplikowski secondcd a <br />motion to approve Resolutions for SUppOlt For The Reuse ofTCAAP Property <br />and Suppoli For TCAAP Reuse and Acquisition, subject to changes by staff in <br />light of the discussion, and provided staff transmit rcvised resolutions for <br />approval by Councilmembers prior to distribution. The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br />