My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-13-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CC 05-13-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:32 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:34:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MAY 13,2002 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />additional regulatory authority over this type of process by designating the site as <br />regionally significant. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant stated he was also surprised about the City seeking this <br />grant. He stated he understood the developer would incur this cost. He asked who <br />directed this. Mr. Lynch replied Mr. Parrish approached him regarding applying <br />for funding and he asked Mr. Parrish to obtain the information. He stated the <br />developer did expect the City to have some money on the table and staff thought <br />they would first attempt this route to attempt to obtain funding from the <br />Metropolitan CounciL <br /> <br />Council Member Larson stated whoever came up with the idea of this should be <br />commended, He indicated this would help the City with the preparation for <br />planning to develop the land. He stated the developer was not out to do the City a <br />favor, and the City needed its own resources to participate in this project. He stated <br />this was a great idea and it gave them the funding and the independence to do this <br />without relying on the developer for funding. He stated the alternative was that the <br />City taxpayer money be spent, and he believed they should obtain funding from the <br />Metropolitan Council. He indicated he believed this was a significant project <br />regionally and wanted to obtain the Metropolitan Co unci I' s assistance with this. <br /> <br />Council Member Rem asked what the long-term implications would be if they <br />obtained this grant. She stated the Metropolitan Council was not going to give the <br />City something for nothing either. She indicated she did agree going to the <br />Metropolitan Council for funding for the planning process, but to her it would <br />make more sense if it was put into the framework as to what the City had just <br />committed to in terms of working with the developer. Mr. Parrish replied this grant <br />application process was directed by deadlines, He indicated the Metropolitan <br />Council would be making a decision in July. Otherwise, they would need to wait <br />until next year to submit another a grant request. <br /> <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski stated her concern was if money was going to be <br />pooled with the developer's money, but if the City kept it separate and if this <br />helped the City with the planning process, she thought this would be a good way to <br />proceed. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant stated Metropolitan Council money was tax money and <br />they had a developer who would come forward for this funding, it seemed to him <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.