Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 8, 2001 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked Ms. Chaput to point out the location of the compactor in relation to the <br />dumpster. Ms. Chaput indicated the area Mayor Probst was inquiring about. Ms. Chaput stated <br />the applicant was present if Council had any questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she understood the business had grown a lot, but was <br />concerned that the Council kept reviewing this issue about the garbage and trash compactor. She <br />asked what could be done about this. Ms. Chaput replied maybe the whole area needed to be <br />screened in. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the original applicant was no longer the owner of the property. He made a <br />request of applicant that they deal with these issues more comprehensively. He stated the <br />Council had a variety of requests for the same issues and Council did not like these issues <br />coming to them in bits and pieces instead of on a comprehensive basis. <br /> <br />Sue Compton, Manufacturing Services, stated they did look at the whole issue before they <br />moved into the building. She indicated at the time they moved into the building, they had 350 <br />employees, they now had over 600 employees. She stated part of the problem was petroleum <br />waste and that took up a large portion of the waste. She indicated they used to have a 40-yard <br />compactor before they moved into this facility, and stated she did not think it would be this soon <br />that they would grow out of the current compactor. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated he did not have an issue with Manufacturing Services, but did have a <br />problem with United Properties. He stated Manufacturing Services was a good business to have <br />in the City, but he was frustrated with United Properties indifference to this situation. Ms. <br />Chaput stated United Properties was willing to do something about this, but does not know if the <br />solution was to enclose each dumpster. She stated she would be talking to United Properties <br />again about this issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked if applicant was okay with the recommendations being made. <br />Ms. Compton indicated they were. She explained the screening would be put on one side of the <br />compactor because of the dock doors. She indicated if they put screening on the side of the dock <br />doors, they run the risk of the screening getting hit by the semi-tractors. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked ifthey had problems with the current compactor getting hit by the <br />semi-tractors. Ms. Compton stated the current compactor did not get hit by the semi-tractors. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked with the new compactor being larger would that create a problem. <br />Ms. Compton replied they would have to be a little more careful turning around, but there would <br />be no other problems. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated it was nice to see the business growing, but he did not believe they <br />would ever get a solution to this until Council finally made it clear to the owners of the building <br />that they needed to add wing walls to the building or more landscaping. He disagreed that <br />enclosing each dumpster could be a solution. He indicated he would vote against this until the <br />management took a more global approach to this problem. <br />