Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 29,2001 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked what the life expectancy and maintenance cost of the fence was. <br />Mr. Getstad replied he did not know the answers to this question, but reminded the City Council <br />that maintenance would be the financial responsibility of MnDOT. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he preferred fence E-l or E-2. He indicated he did not like the <br />look of the concrete fence. With respect to the City Logo, it would depend on what the fence <br />looked like. He stated any landscaping that would be added would be a definite advantage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she preferred fence E-2 in the darker color. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the State had done a study in terms of overall cost of each of <br />these. Mr. Getstad responded he did not know the answer to that, but would see if he could <br />obtain this information. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated his preference was either fence E-l or E-2. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson left the meeting at 9: 18 p.m. and returned at 9:20 p.m. <br /> <br />The Council agreed on fence E-2, in probably the dark stain, and requested staffto inform the <br />park owner to communicate to the residents the wall would be put up. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />City Hall Construction - Change Order #2; Pay Request #4; Professional Design <br />Service Fee, Architectural Alliance. <br /> <br />1. Change Order #2 <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained Change Order #2 was for a traffic loop detector that was in conflict with the <br />installation of the water main. The Contractor was able to move the loop detector wire out of the <br />way by hand and had no adverse effects on the project. Ramsey County workers would replace <br />the wire that was moved out of the way. The total for this work was $112.00. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst suggested authorizing the City Administrator authority to pay amounts up to <br />$5,000.00 in total, so Change Orders did not need to be decided by the Council at every meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant suggested authorizing the City Administrator authority to pay amounts up <br />to $1,000.00. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked ifthis would be a cumulative total of $5,000.00 in Change Orders, or <br />$5,000.00 per Change Order. Mayor Probst replied he intended it would be a cumulative total. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant indicated he had misunderstood Mayor Probst's suggestion. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Change Order #2 in the amount of$112.00, and authorizing the <br />City Administrator authority to approve up to $5,000.00 in Change Orders with <br />