My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 01-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:35 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 29,2001 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />addressed as soon as possible because of utility conflicts. He indicated the County was <br />. supportive of trails and tunnels. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the County would be financially supportive of a trail and tunnel <br />crossing. Mr. Tolaas replied the County had, in the past, contributed small amounts to trails and <br />tunnels and this could be looked at. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch asked ifthe County has in the past given credit against improvements to the City as <br />opposed to a cash disbursement. Mr. Tolaas replied that had been done with Cities in the past <br />and could be something that could be looked into. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolaas stated County Road I and the Shutta intersection current volumes did not warrant a <br />signal at this time. He indicated with a realignment of County Road I, they expected traffic <br />volumes might increase somewhat. He indicated they would be releasing their Project <br />Development Report in the near future. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch inquired about acquisition costs to the City for the properties for the County Road I <br />project. Mr. Tolaas replied he assumed there would be acquisition costs, except in the instance <br />of a realignment issue. However, for widening issues, the City would bear the cost. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />a. <br />b. <br /> <br />January 2,2001 Organizational Council Meeting <br />January 8, 2001 Regular Council Meeting <br />January 16,2001 Council Worksession <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson requested the following corrections: <br /> <br />January 16,2001, Worksession, Page 2, 11th Paragraph, 2nd sentence, "Councilmembers Larson <br />and Rem had no preference, other than that Councilmember Larson was glad we were not using <br />TeamWorks only because it would be nice to have a change." <br /> <br />January 16,2001, Worksession, Page 2, last Paragraph, last sentence to Page 3, 15t Paragraph, <br />"Councilmember Larson commented on the review format, and stated that the questions were <br />difficult to determine his day-to-day operations of the City." <br /> <br />January 8, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes, Page 5, last paragraph, remove "if' in front of Mr. <br />Whittles. <br /> <br />January 8, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes, Page 8, last paragraph, second to the last sentence, <br />"He did not agree that enclosing each dumpster could be a solution". <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem requested the following corrections: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />January 2, 2001, Special Council meeting Minutes, Page 1, she pointed out the Minutes did not <br />indicate who requested the changes to the December 11, 2000 Regular Council Meeting Minutes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.