My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-05-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 02-05-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:35 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 5, 2001 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />would be put in place in the future. He stated he was not certain about the camera in the parking <br />lot and the camera in the lobby area. He indicated though he did understand the concern with the <br />receptionist not having a direct line of vision to the main door. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem expressed surprise this issue had not been thought of before. She stated <br />because it would be a public building, it would make sense to have the proximity card system. <br />She stated her only objection was the cost of the system and that this issue had not been brought <br />up before now. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked ifthe main lobby doors would be glass or wood. Mr. Stafford <br />replied they would be glass. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she was hesitant to approve the whole security system, but <br />did possibly see the need for this type of a system in the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated if the City Hall would be open after hours, a flexible security system would be <br />the best type of system to obtain. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated with a proximity card, there would be no issue of setting off the <br />building alarm system, which would reduce false alarms. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated an advantage would be knowing who accessed the door at what <br />time and a regular-keyed system would not allow that. He also stated the doors could be coded <br />to be locked at certain times, so nobody could access the building after certain hours. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked how many direct doors gain access to the City offices. Mr. <br />Stafford replied there would be three doors. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he believed they should wire for the system, but was hesitant to <br />approve the system at this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked how the City would pay for this if they decided to approve the <br />system. Mr. Lynch replied this would be an issue they would need to discuss. He stated another <br />cost not originally in the estimate was the charge for an emergency back-up generator, as well <br />other charges that had come up recently. <br /> <br />Mr. Post stated in the absence of a proximity card system, the same access and security system <br />the City Hall currently has in its leased offices would be the system that would be in the new <br />City Hall when it opened. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst suggested staff to deal with whatever needed to get done with respect to conduit <br />and wire at this time and Council would decide in the future as to the rest of the security system. <br />Councilmember Larson agreed and stated once the City was in the building for a few months, <br />they may see the need for a proximity system at that time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.