My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-03-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
01-03-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 11:16:58 AM
Creation date
1/5/2024 10:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JANUARY 3, 2024 3 <br />Ms. Gourlay reiterated they wanted efficient meetings, to stay on appropriate topics, everyone's <br />voice be heard, and to avoid personal comments. Some of the items they are considering would <br />address some of that list. <br />Ms. Gourlay said sometimes councils have struggles with how to get things on the agenda, <br />what's the complaint process, or the process for taking something off the consent agenda. <br />Oftentimes it has to do with how things get heard. She wondered what's the process for assigning <br />committees, is there an assumption that everyone gets a committee and similar types of things. <br />Council discussed adding committee/commission reports to future agendas, and about tying it into <br />committee/commission liaison responsibilities. <br />Ms. Gourlay recommended they have a work session item for discussion of committee updates <br />before it be brought for a vote at a regular meeting so there is no misunderstanding of what the <br />policy will be. She asked if this session was a useful conversation. <br />Council discussed not bring up past issues when making decisions affecting the present and <br />future. <br />Ms. Gourlay said they should move forward with discussing the issues they talked about at work <br />sessions and if they would like her to come back she could. She could also arrange for not full <br />group discussions. <br />Ms. Gourlay said they remind her of good people with knowledge coming together from <br />different places but the team can't come together. <br />Council thanked Ms. Gourlay for her time. <br />2. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS <br />City Administrator Perrault said he had emailed two questions to the Council. The 2024 PMP <br />was at 80% plan and was scheduled to be an item on the upcoming work session, did they prefer <br />to leave it on that meeting. Also, did they want to schedule a retreat, if so he will find a date. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would rather do a special work session on January 22 for the PMP, <br />and she would love to have a retreat in March or April. <br />Councilmember Monson was comfortable with having the PMP discussion on either date but <br />she could make January 22 work. <br />Mayor Grant explained there's what they go in at and then there's the bid. So, 80% was <br />probably close enough. <br />Councilmember Monson said then she was fine with it being on January 8 at 80%. She would <br />like to have city goals at a retreat but didn't think they needed the personality piece. <br />Mayor Grant felt a retreat was the wrong way to approach it. He thought it would be better for <br />the group to look at some strategic topics and discuss them. He didn't know if they needed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.