CC 03-26-2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 26,2001 10 Councilmember Aplikowski concurred. Councilmember Latson stated he would like to eliminate EFIS and set their sights high. He noted he wanted to get something they had always talked about and that looks classy. Councilmember Aplikowski stated her problem is seeing all other types of industrial buildings. She noted if the campuses all were bricks, she would hold them further. She added she does not think it fair to hold them to brick or stone only. Councilmember Grant stated as long as it would be multi-story it seems that 10 percent is acceptable. He noted the other three updates on page 4 are agreeable. Ms. Chaput stated staff asks the EA W not be accepted at this time. Councilmember Aplikowski asked if it should be a separate motion. Mr. Shardlow requested they amend the permitted uses to add a freestanding daycare only if it is a part of an existing campus development. Councilmember Aplikowski and Grant accepted this amendment as part of the motion. Councilmember Larson asked about the Planning Commission's concerns regarding the striking of language about architectural precast on parking ramp. Ms. Chaput responded she thinks the preference for different materials types came from Commissioner Erickson. Mr. Shardlow stated they submitted the EA W on the date before the publication date. He noted he assumed copies would be sent out for distribution. He added they would want the information generated in the EA W for the design process. He stated this project is defined well enough to do an EA W. He noted they hope they could have a conversation with Mr. Downing at the EQB and process the EA W. He added that this is a step that could go through. Ms. Chaput stated it was part of the submittal so staff is concerned they would take action on it as part of the application. She noted that she spoke to a representative from the Environmental Quality Board, who was unsure that an EA W was necessary at this point in the project. Mayor Probst stated he suggests the Minutes record no action was taken on the EA W. Mr. Shardlow stated there is a whole 30-day process and a public hearing to go through. Ms. Chaput stated that staff needed to consult with the City Attorney to determine if the Master PUD is at a stage for the EA W to be reviewed. MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve the Request for Master PUD for Chesapeake Companies, I-35W and I- 694 in Case #01-05 as recommended by Staff with updates except 30 percent