My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-30-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 04-30-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:36 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 30, 2001 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked about the height of the taller buildings. Mr. Larson responded <br />they would like seven to eight levels if possible. He stated they are trying to clear out some of <br />the site so they can develop the next phase. He noted that with the parking ramp they would <br />have 400 additional parking spots. <br /> <br />Mr. Reimer stated they have huge parking lots and they would like to break them up and add <br />additional greenspace. He noted the parking ramp allows them to do that and add the <br />greenspace. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked about the proposed buildings and ramps impact on traffic flow. Mr. <br />Rymer responded that is all part of the planning to be done. He stated parking studies and lot <br />flows need to be studied. He noted he doubts they would have all that information by the end of <br />the year. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked ifthe parking ramp is to set the stage for future changes. Mr. Reimer <br />responded in the affirmative. He stated the ramp would serve buildings A, B, & C. He stated <br />that frees up a lot of surface parking. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion <br />to receive approve Planning Case 01-02, PUD Amendment and Site Plan Review <br />with all the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. The motion <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Planning Case 01-06, Jon Lundin, 1164 Amble Drive, Variance (Lakeshore <br />setback). <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput explained the applicant is requesting a variance from the ordinary high water mark <br />setback ofKarth Lake (43 feet proposed, with cantilever). She stated 75 feet is required for the <br />expansion of an existing deck with an enclosed patio on grade. She noted the new deck would <br />be slightly larger and would be located no closer to the Ordinary High Water (OHW) setback <br />from Karth Lake than the existing deck. She added this is the second variance from the OHW of <br />Karth Lake within the last six months. She stated the Planning Commission has based their <br />recommendation on the assumption the setback would be amended from 75 to 50 feet in May. <br />She noted the Commission recommended that development on this property be permitted no <br />closer than 50 feet to the lake. She added the deadline for Agency actions is May 11,2001. She <br />added there was a letter of opposition received from the city by Dr. Cesar Farrell. She stated he <br />was concerned about the quality of the lake and the affect of moving a structure closer. She <br />noted that after an explanation of the project, he was not as concerned. She read the <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Jon Lundin stated his wife and he request this approval for a variance for a new deck with a <br />screened porch underneath. He noted no part of the screened porch would go outside the existing <br />footprint. He added they are getting a little cantilever because there would be better drainage. <br />He stated the deck has been there for 22 years and is 45 feet from the lake. He noted they used <br />an architect to enhance the appearance of the home. He added they have been told others have <br />been successful in requests for variances before so he paid the money for site a survey. He stated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.