My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 05-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:36 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 29, 2001 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked about the cost of acquiring these easements through <br />condemnation. Mr. Filla responded he does not know the cost. He stated one of them was <br />acquired when this area was still part of New Brighton. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated given the development proposals for this parcel it is likely the city would be <br />vacating these pieces of streets. He noted he is curious of the implications of that and asked if <br />the Council would be looking at this again. Mr. Filla responded in the affirmative and noted the <br />city would have to vacate the street that is now being dedicated. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked what advantage it was to the developer in doing it now. Mr. Filla responded <br />the developer wants to market this parcel and needs to show it is platted. He stated this is a step <br />towards that goal. He suggested that condition three should be memorialized in some way. He <br />noted the city should have the developer sign a restrictive covenant showing that the blocks <br />would not be developed separately and that all parcels would be consolidated. <br /> <br />Ms. Diane Fredeen, of the Chesapeake Companies, stated part of the reason for this approach is <br />that they have a pending purchase agreement on the Morris property, but not on the other two <br />sites. She noted state statute requires them to dedicate a road if there is an easement to the city. <br />She added that when they have purchased all three sites then they would ask for a vacation on the <br />dedication. She stated they have a closing date on the purchase of the Morris property and are <br />still in negotiations on the other two sites. She noted they would eventually be combining all <br />three into one property. <br /> <br />. Mr. Filla asked if one condition of the purchase is that, the property would be platted. Ms. <br />Fredeen responded in the affirmative. She stated it is related to the outlots. She noted the seller <br />wanted legal title to the outlots. <br /> <br />As no one else wished to appear, Mayor Probst closed the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated a revised resolution states, "Those positions" should be replaced with <br />"Those portions". <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion <br />to approve Resolution #01-11 and Planning Case #01-09, final plat of the property <br />located in the Northeast quadrant ofl-694 and 1-35W, for reasons outlined in <br />Resolution #01-11 and subject to the following: the conditions stated in the staff <br />report and an additional requirement that the Developer execute a restrictive <br />covenant memorializing condition 3 as stated therein. The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />2. Case #01-12A, Manufacturers' Services, 4300 Round Lake Road, pun Amendment <br />(Phase I Parking) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained the applicant has requested the ability to expand the existing parking lot in <br />two phases. He stated the Planning Commission recommended acceptance of the Phase I plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.