My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
12-11-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 9:09:31 AM
Creation date
1/9/2024 9:09:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—DECEMBER 11, 2023 3 <br /> the interim tobacco ordinance. She indicated her client was in the process of selling the tobacco <br /> shop since mid-November. She reported the purchase of this business was contingent upon the <br /> buyer receiving a tobacco license. She indicated Mr. Hussain (the buyer) submitted a tobacco <br /> license application on November 22, which was prior to the November 27 City Council meeting <br /> where the interim ordinance was passed by the City Council. She asked that Mr. Hussain's <br /> application be considered so that her client may sell his business. While she understood the intent <br /> of the ordinance, she reported this business has been operating in the community for many years. <br /> She requested this application go through the consideration process in order to allow the sale to be <br /> completed. <br /> 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES <br /> City Administrator Perrault provided a response for the Public Inquiries made at the November <br /> 27, 2023 City Council meeting. He explained a resident asked JDA members to publicly confirm <br /> whether the proposed 1,960 density number would go up or change. He deferred to these <br /> Councilmembers to see if they wanted to offer additional comments, but noted this was the <br /> number the JDA and developer has agreed upon as a maximum density for the project. He noted <br /> decisions made today, do not bind the future elected body. He reported a future Council could <br /> propose more or less density. He stated any future changes would be dependent on County <br /> approval. He commented on another question raised by the public regarding development along <br /> Highway 96. He stated he could not speak definitively to the references that were made, he noted <br /> development occurs within each community per their own specific zoning codes and development <br /> procedures. He indicated he was not aware of a project along Highway 96 that was the same scope <br /> of Rice Creek Commons. He reported the most recent development along Highway 96 was in <br /> Vadnais Heights at McMenemy Street which was comprised of 163 units across 13.44 acres <br /> which had a density of 12 units per acre. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated for the record, the future Council could be made up of existing <br /> Councilmembers. <br /> Councilmember Monson explained she was the Councilmember that spoke to other <br /> developments along Highway 96. She indicated her general comment was that this roadway would <br /> continue to develop and more housing or commercial would be added. She understood that no <br /> other communities would have the same scale as the Rice Creek Commons project. She reported <br /> this Council has an incredible opportunity to make an amazing development in close proximity to <br /> large metropolitan areas. <br /> 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS <br /> None. <br /> 6. STAFF COMMENTS <br /> None. <br /> 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.