My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-24-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 09-24-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:37 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 24,2001 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the county would permit a curb cut there. Mr. Parrish responded he did <br />not investigate that issue since it was the responsibility of the applicant. He stated that <br />presumably it would not be a problem. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked about wetlands. Mr. Parrish responded there were no wetland <br />considerations on this property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he felt uncomfortable voting either way. He noted he did not <br />think he had enough information to make an informed decision. He asked for another 30 days to <br />get more information. <br /> <br />Mr. Sladek asked what information would be helpful. He stated if one walked by the lot, the <br />split made sense. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated from what one could see from the road it looked reasonable, but <br />he was not sure about the remaining undeveloped properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated the city could extend for another 60 days if it let the applicant know it needed <br />additional information. He noted the Council needed more information about the stubbing of <br />utilities and what occurred at that time. He added they needed to know what was it assessed and <br />for how much. He stated they could extend the time for an additional days if the city gives notice <br />to the applicant before October 6, 2001. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he knew there were some concerns about land locking in this area. He noted <br />he wanted more information on this issue. He added he did not know if sewer and water stubs <br />made this buildable lot. He stated staff needed to update the information on what had been built. <br /> <br />Mr. Venessey stated the builder was trying to get the basement in before the ground freezes. He <br />noted they were willing to agree to an extension to October 29,2001. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the applicant needs to be aware the council needed additional <br />information. He noted a recommendation to deny the application from the Planning Commission <br />gives him some pause. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to extend the deadline for review by 60 days based on a need for <br />additional information. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Pay Estimate #6 (Final), 2001 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Lift Station #8 <br />Reconstruction and Sanitary Sewer Test and Seal/Spot Repairs), Gridor <br />Construction <br /> <br />Mr. Brown explained the Pay Estimate and that all work had been completed. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to approve Pay Estimate #6 (Final Payment) for Gridor Construction, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.