Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> NOVEMBER 26, 2001 2 <br />. 3. On page 9, in the second paragraph, in the second sentence, replace "what" with "the type <br /> of development" and insert "to see" before "on the site". <br /> Councilmember Rem requested the following changes on page 10fthe October 29,2001 Regular <br /> Council Meeting: under Approval of Meeting Agenda, replace "removed" with "moved to the <br /> discussion under Unfinished and New Business" in both sentences. <br /> Mayor Probst requested the following change to the October 29,2001 Regular Council meeting <br /> minutes: on page 12, in the "build the argument" not "make the argument". <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion <br /> to approve the October 29,2001 Regular Council Meeting minutes as corrected <br /> above. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> A. Claims and Payroll <br /> B. Final Payment, Contract Retainage, 2001 North and South Water Tower Maintenance <br /> Project <br /> C. Trinity Lutheran Church Joint Use Agreement <br /> D. City Hall Maintenance Contract Approval <br />. E. 2002 Official Meeting Calendar, Approval of City Council and Planning Commission <br /> Meeting Dates <br /> F. Joint Powers Agreement, City of Roseville (Technology Services) <br /> G. Springbrook Financial Software Purchase <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br /> approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents <br /> contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Mayor Probst invited those present to come forward and address the Council on any items not <br /> already on the agenda. <br /> No public comments were made. <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Planning Cases <br /> 1. Case #01-22, Beacon Construction, County Road E-2 and Cleveland; Rezoning, <br />. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Master and Final Planned Unit Development <br /> Mr. Parrish explained the location of the proposed apartment building. He reviewed the <br /> history of the case. He stated the applicant had facilitated a site visit. He noted that in <br />