Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> DECEMBER 10,2001 11 <br /> . 3. Case #01-16, City of Arden Hills, Shoreland Ordinance, Introduction and <br /> First Reading of Ordinance No. 334 <br /> Mr. Parrish explained this the latest in the City's codification effort. He stated there were no <br /> changes other than the comments by the City Attorney. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion <br /> to accept in Planning Case #01-16 the first reading of Ordinance #334, an <br /> Ordinance adopting Shoreland management standards within the City of Arden <br /> Hills. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> C. 2002 Budget <br /> 1. Authorization to Cancel December 17, 2001 Truth-in-Taxation Continuation <br /> Hearing <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion <br /> to cancel the December 17, 2001, Truth-in-Taxation Continuation Hearing, as <br /> recommended by staff. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> D. New City Code of Ordinances <br /> . 1. Adoption of City Code of Ordinance <br /> 2. Ord.#335, "An Ordinance Summary Adopting a New Municipal Code for <br /> the City of Arden Hills, MN, Amending, Restating, Revising, Updating, <br /> Codifying and Compiling Certain Ordinances of the City of Arden Hills <br /> Dealing with the Subjects Embraced in the Code of Ordinances, and <br /> Providing Penalties for the Violations of the Code of Ordinances" <br /> 3. Res. #01-24, "Adopting a Schedule of Fees and Charges for Various Services, <br /> License and Permits for the City of Arden Hills, MN" <br /> Mr. Lynch explained the City Attorney has found that the League of Minnesota Cities and the <br /> statutes do not require a publication of a public hearing notice for a re-codification. He stated the <br /> city just did a notification for public information and record. He noted there is no 14 or 10 day <br /> requirement. <br /> Mr. Filla stated the statute that set up the City's right to do this re-codification does not require a <br /> public hearing. He noted if the Council intended to adopt parts ofthe City Code that required <br /> public hearings because of the Land Planning Act, then the City would have to hold a public <br /> hearing. He added the City was not changing the zoning regulations. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated his preference for leaving the matter on the table until the meeting <br /> on December 17, 2001. He noted this would give them more time to go through Councilmember <br /> Rem's and Mr. Filla's recommendations. <br /> . Mayor Probst stated there would be a full agenda for the meeting on December 17, 2001. <br />