My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-30-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 01-30-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:39 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:13:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />.e <br />. <br /> <br />MINUTES <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />JANUARY 30,1995 <br />7:30 P.M. . NEW BRIGHTON CITY HALL <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CAT T <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regular <br />City Council meeting at 7:32 p.m. <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Dennis Probst; Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks, <br />Paul Malone and Susan Keirn. <br /> <br />Also present were: Acting Clerk! Administrator, Terry Post; Public Works <br />Superintendent, Dan Winkel; Parks and Recreation Director, Cindy Walsh; Planning <br />Coordinator, Brian Fritsinger; and Recording Secretary, Ruth McLaurin. <br /> <br />ADOPT AGENDA <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted a revised agenda before Council, adding an item to Consent Calendar <br />4(f). <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the <br />January 30, 1995 City Council meeting as revised. The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />January 3,1995, Special Council Meeting. <br /> <br />January 9,1995, Regular Council Meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone had a clarification for the January 9, 1995 Meeting, page three. <br />Councilmember Malone noted there has not yet been a determination of assessment at this <br />point. He indicated typically, the Council would base assessments on the value provided by the <br />improvement. As a matter of past practice, the Council has assessed half of the value of <br />a typical residential street, not necessarily the project at hand, to the resident. <br /> <br />Councilmember Keirn also indicated clarification, her question was: would the resident be <br />assessed 50% of the total cost, or would the resident be assessed 50% of the reduced cost after <br />contribution from the county for the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.