Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />,ARD:t;N HilLS CITY COUNCIL -lAN1JARY 30. 1995 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE #95-03: EAST SIDE BEVERAGE SITE PLAN FENCE REQUEST. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated the applicant is requesting the approval of a site plan consisting of a seven <br />foot high chain link fence with a one foot strand barbed wire on the top. Mr. Fritsinger noted <br />the Planning Commi..~ion approved the request without the barbed wire addition. The applicant <br />requests that the City Council reconsider the use of barbed wire for determent purposes. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated this fence is constructed at East Side Beverage, 1260 Grey Fox Road. Mr. <br />Fritsinger indicated the applicant has contacted the City several times in the past with concerns <br />about theft and vandalism on the site. Primarily these problems have been caused by juveniles <br />who are frequently in the area. The fence is an attempt to reduce or eIiminate this problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger noted the applicant apparently constructed the chain link portion of this fence in <br />August. This was in response to both a labor strike and the problems stated above. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the barbed wire would be around the entire length of the <br />fence. The applicant indicated, he is requesting that the south side and portion of the west side <br />have the barb wire attached excluding the gate area. <br /> <br />CounciImember Hicks questioned why only a portion of the fence and not all of the fence would <br />have the barbed wire. The applicant indicated there is a greater problem of access on the south <br />side due to the railroad tracks, and thicker brush, where sometimes the product is hidden until <br />a later time when it is picked up. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired as to the objections of the Planning Commission. Mr. <br />Fritsinger indicated their concern was the safety issues of barb wire and suggested alternative <br />preventive measures, such as lighting. <br /> <br />MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #95- <br />03; East Side Beverage Site Plan Fence request with the one foot high barbed wire <br />along the south side and along approximately one-half of the distance of the west <br />side starting from the south. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE #95-04: BETHF.T. COLLEGE SITE PLAN REVIEW <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated the applicant is requesting approval of additions to two academic <br />buildings and a residence hall. The Planning Commission approved the plan subject to the two <br />stated conditions. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated the proposed building additions are consistent with the approved Master <br />Plan or the deviations in building footprint configurations are considered insignificant. <br />