My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-10-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 04-10-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:40 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:13:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I" <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN lllLLS CITY COUNCIL - Anrill O. 1995 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Mr. Casey indicated that the preliminary report of the Rice Creek Watershed District is mute if the <br />Environmental Policy Act is followed, noting there may be a potential for significant environmental <br />impact. <br /> <br />Mr. Casey felt the gaps in information needed, would be provided by an EA W. <br /> <br />Mr. Price requested the petitioners to show impact. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated the Council Chambers was not a Court of Law, and requested any additional <br />statements be in regard to new information relevant to this case. He indicated the City Council is <br />present to review information and determine if an EA W is to be ordered.. He then invited the <br />audience to make any additional comments at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Mullin, 1793 Gramsie Road, believed that the impact should not only be on environment, <br />but on pure space. <br /> <br />Mr. ShrankIer indicated the Rice Creek Watershed District will not make its final findings until May <br />4, and after the decision of an EA W has been determined. He noted the assessment was not only an <br />environmental assessment, but also a soil assessment. <br /> <br />Mr. Dan Ogren, 466 Old Farm Road, indicated he is not in favor of an EA W, because a wetland <br />has not yet been identified on the northeast comer. <br /> <br />Mr. Ogren also indicated he believed that the cost of the EA W should not be imposed on the <br />developer. Mr. Ogren indicated he did not sign an application with the understanding of ordering <br />an EA W, <br /> <br />Mr. Ogren indicated the delay will not prevent him from developing the land, either with townhomes <br />or single family detached homes. Mr. Ogren indicated he would pursue the development until it is <br />done. <br /> <br />Ms. Angela Hames, 1839 Venus Avenue, inquired as to the cost of an EAW. Mr. Fritsinger <br />indicated the cost could range from hundreds to thousands of dollars. <br /> <br />Ms, Hames indicated she understands business issues, but with the admitted dedication to the <br />environment of Mr. Ogren, would not the money be well spent particularly ifhe desires the best <br />possible project available. <br /> <br />Ms. Canniff indicated the desires of the whole community needs to be considered. She noted the <br />flooding in the Red River Valley, and expressed concern that similar problems will occur in this <br />area, She expressed concern that the oaks would be destroyed during development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.