My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-10-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 04-10-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:40 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:13:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - ADrilIO. 1995 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Hicks moved and Keim seconded a motion to set a special meeting for April 17, <br />1995, at 4:30 p.m. at the Army Reserve building. The motion passed unanimously <br />(5-0). <br /> <br />Adopt Resolution #95-28. Establishing the Assessed Cost for the County Road F <br />Reconstruction. <br /> <br />Mr, Stonehouse indicated the City received bids for the project on March 30, 1995. He indicated <br />he recommended acceptance of all four bids and to award the bid to Midwest Asphalt, Inc. upon <br />approval of plans by MnDOT, completion of the assessment hearing, and final resolution of trail and <br />street width issues. He also indicated all conditions and transactions as noted should be subject to <br />review and input by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated staffhas been working with the neighborhood and presented a few changes. <br />Mr. Stonehouse indicated, from what he had reviewed, the changes would reduce the cost of the <br />project, but have no actual effect on the assessments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the sidewalk would be removed. Mr. Fritsinger indicated <br />it had not yet been agreed to. Councilmember Aplikowski was not in favor of sidewalks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if parking on the street was a concern for neighbors. Mr. <br />Stonehouse indicated the road would be wide enough, but there was concern regarding traffic if <br />parking is allowed. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated based on comments from residents, the concern for the walkway was in <br />regards to impact on their properties. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone indicated in the past, if there was a walkway people will use them, but he <br />expressed mixed feelings regarding the walkway. He indicated perhaps an easement compromise <br />would help. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone indicated a parking ban on the street would be okay. He indicated the speed <br />limit would most likely remain the same. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Keirn moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #95-28, <br />Determining Assessed Cost of Improvement and Ordering Preparation of Proposed <br />Assessment Roll in the Matter of County Road F Street Improvements of 1995. <br /> <br />Mr. Craig Wilson inquired as to why if the project costs were reduced, the assessment did not go <br />down. Mr. Stonehouse indicated the assessment per foot did not change due to the amount being <br />based upon a typical street improvement, not necessarily this specific project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.