Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - ADriI 10, 1995 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Mr. Casey noted the Environmental Policy Act has been on the books for 20 years, and through this <br />act there is an educational and fact finding mission under Environmental Quality Board rules and <br />state statutes. He indicated a liberal interpretation of these rules follows from the Policy Act itself. <br /> <br />Mr. Casey indicated there are two tests he wishes to discuss, the Mandatory Testing, and the <br />Threshold Test; an alteration of cross section of one acre or more of protected wetland. He indicated <br />another issue is whether or not this would fit the category of where there would be a potential for <br />significant environmental effects. <br /> <br />Mr. Casey implied the City Administrator Mr. Fritsinger may have misquoted the law, he indicated <br />the law states: "...it ~ be done, (EA W) if you find that there may be a potential for significant <br />environmental effects", it is not a ~ but a shall. <br /> <br />Mr. Casey addressed the Threshold Test; whether or not a cross section ofland or lake is effected. <br />He noted a wetland map indicated three wetland areas. He approached the Council and identified <br />the area he referenced. He indicated unless the City has identified the wetland as exempt, those <br />areas are protected under the Wetlands Conservation Act. <br /> <br />Mr. Casey indicated the developer admits to changing the course and cross section of the wetlands. <br />The DNR has received an Engineering Application from the developer, which indicated the site <br />drainage would be outletted to the lake at velocity, and would impact the protected water. <br /> <br />Mr. Casey indicated wetlands to the west may also be effected due to change oftopography during <br />development. <br /> <br />Mr, Casey encouraged individuals to add to testimony already given regarding potential <br />environmental effects, and he would comment later. <br /> <br />Mr. Mark Chapin, 3947 Rolling Hills Road, indicated he would like to add three items in regards <br />to environmental effects that he believed had not already been mentioned. <br /> <br />Mr. Chapin indicated he would like to provide three additional documents for the record. First he <br />indicated he had a Minnesota Geological Survey Plate from 1992. He stated this identifies the <br />wetland to the west of the proposed development as an area which has a high sensitivity to pollution. <br />1bis means the estimated travel time for water going from contaminants at the land surface to reach <br />the water table systems are within hours to months, <br /> <br />Mr, Chapin also he indicated he had two letters from Ramsey County, one letter dated April 5, 1995 <br />addressed to Mr. Fritsinger from Gregory Mack, which indicates the easement on the property is an <br />interest the County owns and wishes the City to respect this in regards to the development. He <br />indicated the second letter was mentioned at the Council meeting of March 27 and states the interest <br />