My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-26-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 06-26-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:40 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:13:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.- <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />.- <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 26. 1995 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />feet (long side) plus 90 feet (short side) would be 50+90=140 front footage assessed. He noted there <br />is a five year limit in which the property can use this formula <br /> <br />Mr, Fregeau inquired, if one street is a County Road, would the County still take this formula into <br />consideration. Councilmember Malone indicated the County would assess through the City, so the <br />City would take this into consideration. <br /> <br />Ms. Alan Pixler for Nancy Levine, 1926 Stowe Avenue, indicated the letter her mother received <br />was very confusing. She inquired as to whether a triangular piece of the property was part of the <br />assessment. Mayor Probst indicated it would be based on the legal description. <br /> <br />Ms, Pixler indicated it is odd shaped double lot and she inquired if200 feet is appropriate. Mayor <br />Probst indicated if it is a double lot, potentially 200 feet would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Mr. Stonehouse verified the triangular portion of the parcel is within the right of way and would not <br />be assessed. <br /> <br />Ms. Pixler indicated her mother is recently widowed, she inquired as to who to speak with regarding <br />an appeal application based on recent deaths, Mayor Probst indicated she would contact City <br />Administrator Brian Fritsinger, <br /> <br />Ms. Pixler indicated she would like to have seen more notice of the Hearing and the language of the <br />notice easier to read. Councilmember Malone indicated because of State requirements, the City must <br />send a legal document to notify residents of the Public Hearing. He noted at the Public Hearing <br />itself, staff and Council are able to explain the details of the project. <br /> <br />Ms. Jolene Sazma, 1909 Stowe Avenue, indicated at a previous meeting a Councilmember stated <br />the residents do not pay enough taxes for what is received. Ms. Sazma indicated she was offended <br />by that statement. <br /> <br />Ms, Sazma indicated she has been aware of the improvements to Stowe Avenue, since April of <br />1994. First, she heard about improvements by the County and now by the City, yet nothing has been <br />done, and only now the residents are being assessed for the improvements, <br /> <br />Ms. Sazma expressed concem for paying taxes plus interest for improvements that should have been <br />done long ago. She indicated she would like justification as to the assessments and why the citizens <br />do not pay enough, She also indicated she would like to review the accounts of the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Sazma indicated she did not feel comfortable with the City charging interest on the taxes, she <br />felt the City was trying to act like a credit card company. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.