Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />.. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />.- <br />. <br /> <br />,ARDEN lDLLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 14, 1995 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Ms. Elizabeth Garski, 1795 West County Road F, indicated the problem was caused by the fact <br />that the sewer was not capped at the end of the work clay by the construction crew. She noted the <br />Public Works Superintendent also believed this to be the problem. She noted that she did rea1ize this <br />to be hearsay, but felt this is a clear show of neglect on behalf of the construction crew. <br /> <br />Ms. Garski indicated they were unable to use their air conditioning and the damage was <br />unbelievable. She indicated this to be a continuous comedy of errors regarding the road <br />reconstruction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks noted the Council will be sympathetic. <br /> <br />Ms. Garski believed withholding payment would be the residents only leverage in the issue. He <br />noted he would not want to have to sue the City and the contractor just to resolve this. <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Ricke, 1740 West County Road F, indicated he now has a twelve foot by six foot hole in <br />his foundation. He stated his young family is unable to live there and expressed frustration regarding <br />the entire incident. He urged the City to continue investigating the situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated the City will continue to investigate the concerns and will do what they can. <br />He urged the citizens to continue to keep the City informed of any concerns. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst returned to item four on the agenda <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING - 1995 STREET MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT <br /> <br />Mayor Probst opened the Public Hearing at 8:04 p.m. He noted this is a continuation of the Public <br />Hearing held on July 31, 1995, therefore no additional notification was sent out. <br /> <br />City Engineer Stonehouse briefly reviewed the project and the reason why the Council is at this <br />particular point. He noted the two issues brought up at the last council meeting were the comer lots <br />and outlots and the rate of assessments regarding both. <br /> <br />Mr. Stonehouse indicated, based upon a review of the assessment calculations, the two residential <br />properties (1179 and 1194) at the westerly intersection were previously included at the corner lot rate <br />using the length of the short plus one third of the long side. The two outlots were not calculated <br />using this method and the revised total assessment length for the Hunter's Park Homeowner's <br />Association as a result of these revisions would be 3,554.87 feet, a reduction of317.90 feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Stonehouse explained based upon this change the total assessment amount to the association <br />would be reduced to $14,219.48 and the resulting assessment per lot is $209.11. <br />