CC 09-25-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I Ie I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 25. 1995 3 Laumeyer SUP Home Occupation.Case #95-21 Community Development Director Ringwald briefly reviewed the request for approval of a Special Accessory Use Permit for a home occupation to operate an antique store in the R-2 zoning district. Mr. Ringwald indicated the antique shop will be open only upon request or no more than a couple of times per month. The hours of operation will be limited to weekends during the summer months. The property is also isolated from visual view of all neighboring residential properties. Mr, Ringwald noted the operation will exist entirely within an existing accessory structure. Mr. Ringwald reported the business will be operated by Ms. Laumeyer who has lived at this location for 30 years. And all customer visits will be by appointment only and limited to 1-2 individuals at a time. Mr. Ringwald reported all parking will be accommodated off-street. The driveway can accommodate 6-8 vehicles. There will be no deliveries. Mr. Ringwald indicated the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 95-21 subject to the following conditions: a. The occupation must comply with all of the Zoning requirements as outlined in Section VI, B, 3, a and c, of the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance; b. All signage must comply with the requirements of the Sign Ordinance and its location be limited to the property in question; c. The property may not be sold as a commercial/retail property; and d. Special Use Permit expires with the sale or transfer of the property, the new occupant may reapply for the Special Use Permit. MOTION: Keirn moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve Planning Case 95-21, Special Use Permit-Home Occupation for Sharon Laumeyer, subject to the conditions outlined by staff. Motion carried ummimously (3-0). Bethel SWM Appeal City Adminilltrator Fritsinger reported during 1994, the City received an Appeal for the Surface Water Management (SWM) fees assessed to Bethel College. The City C01DlCil reviewed the Appeal several times in late 1994 and 1995. Mr. Stonehouse indicated this Appeal was based on a number of primary concerns: