My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 12-11-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 12-11-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:42 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> I. .ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DEGEMB.ERJ 1, 1995 6 <br /> I <br /> Council member Aplikowski asked how a nonsingle-family units is defined. Mr. Frost indicated <br /> I anything that is not a typical single-family detached unit. <br /> Mayor Probst inquired as to if the percentages for each of these goals we've determined by the <br /> I existing Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Ringwald indicated that was correct. The percentages for <br /> each goal was determined by evaluating small developing communities in the Metropolitan area, <br /> I not by evaluating some of the residential concepts discussed in the task force meetings. <br /> Council member Hicks indicated, based on current housing sales in Arden Hills, new housing <br /> I would most likely not qualify as affordable housing. Mr. Frost indicated that would be correct, <br /> unless perhaps it would be of a town home or multifamily construction with smaller lot sizes. <br /> I Mayor Probst indicated the affordable housing is also determined by ownership, not necessarily <br /> only single-family dwellings. Mr. Frost indicated that was correct. <br /> I Council member Hicks felt 65% was a high number to achieve in affordable housing, but given <br /> the Council can review participation after one year, he would support the resolution. <br /> I. MOTION: Keirn moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt Resolution Number 95-86, <br /> Livable Communities Act Goals. Motion carried lIn:mimously (5-0), <br /> I Animal Control Services. Inc, Contract <br /> I Community Development Director Ringwald indicated the increase in the contract is mostly due <br /> to the new State law requiring detaining animals for ten days. <br /> I Mr. Ringwald indicated staffs goal to continue to review the expenditures in this area and to <br /> keep the amount under control. <br /> I Mayor Probst inquired if the increase in the budget at certain times is due to more aggressive <br /> ,mimRI control. Mr. Ringwald indicated that was correct. When RnimRls are brought in, the City <br /> is required to hold them for ten days and boarding becomes expensive. <br /> I Mr. Post noted this is another example of an unfunded mandate set forth by the State. <br /> I Mr. Ringwald indicated the current system is to respond to complaints in regard to RnimRI <br /> control and less on setting live traps, etc. <br /> I Council member Aplikowski asked if the property owners could pay a portion of the cost to <br /> contain the RnimRls, such as in the mobile home park. Mr. Fritsinger indicated this could be <br /> I- reviewed as part of the codification process. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.